This patch is closely related to commit 6016df8fe8 ("selftests/bpf:
Fix broken riscv build"). When clang includes the system include
directories, but targeting BPF program, __BITS_PER_LONG defaults to
32, unless explicitly set. Work around this problem, by explicitly
setting __BITS_PER_LONG to __riscv_xlen.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-5-bjorn@kernel.org
Add the test to check sockmap with strparser is working well.
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029141216.211899-3-liujian56@huawei.com
After "skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress", the test case
with ktls failed. This because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value
is 285 not 256.
The case like this:
tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2
tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk
recved 570 btyes data, and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to
tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred.
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029141216.211899-2-liujian56@huawei.com
Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen().
Fixes: 81f77fd0de ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026143409.42666-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com
The allocated ring buffer is never freed, do so in the cleanup path.
Fixes: f446b570ac ("bpf/selftests: Update the IMA test to use BPF ring buffer")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-9-memxor@gmail.com
Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4 ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")
We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.
The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.
Fixes: 0ab5539f85 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
together.
In c48e51c8b0 ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
subtests.
Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using
light skeleton, and convert all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
This patch adds benchmark tests for comparing the performance of hashmap
lookups without the bloom filter vs. hashmap lookups with the bloom filter.
Checking the bloom filter first for whether the element exists should
overall enable a higher throughput for hashmap lookups, since if the
element does not exist in the bloom filter, we can avoid a costly lookup in
the hashmap.
On average, using 5 hash functions in the bloom filter tended to perform
the best across the widest range of different entry sizes. The benchmark
results using 5 hash functions (running on 8 threads on a machine with one
numa node, and taking the average of 3 runs) were roughly as follows:
value_size = 4 bytes -
10k entries: 30% faster
50k entries: 40% faster
100k entries: 40% faster
500k entres: 70% faster
1 million entries: 90% faster
5 million entries: 140% faster
value_size = 8 bytes -
10k entries: 30% faster
50k entries: 40% faster
100k entries: 50% faster
500k entres: 80% faster
1 million entries: 100% faster
5 million entries: 150% faster
value_size = 16 bytes -
10k entries: 20% faster
50k entries: 30% faster
100k entries: 35% faster
500k entres: 65% faster
1 million entries: 85% faster
5 million entries: 110% faster
value_size = 40 bytes -
10k entries: 5% faster
50k entries: 15% faster
100k entries: 20% faster
500k entres: 65% faster
1 million entries: 75% faster
5 million entries: 120% faster
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-6-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates)
and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some
minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks.
These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases,
the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases.
>From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates
are roughly as follows:
1 hash function = ~30%
2 hash functions = ~15%
3 hash functions = ~5%
4 hash functions = ~2.5%
5 hash functions = ~1%
6 hash functions = ~0.5%
7 hash functions = ~0.35%
8 hash functions = ~0.15%
9 hash functions = ~0.1%
10 hash functions = ~0%
For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine
with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte
values are as follows:
1 hash function:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations
Updates - 33.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.15%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations
Updates - 15.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.2%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations
Updates - 33.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.04%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.06%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations
Updates - 33.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.42%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations
Updates - 32.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations
Updates - 13.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.58%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations
Updates - 31.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.94%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations
Updates - 13.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.95%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations
Updates - 28.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 31.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations
Updates - 11.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.98%
2 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations
Updates - 20.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.21%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.19%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.54%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations
Updates - 7.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.52%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations
Updates - 16.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.77%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations
Updates - 6.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.88%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations
Updates - 14.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
3 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.65%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.58%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations
Updates - 14.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.71%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.3 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.62%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations
Updates - 13.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.62%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations
Updates - 4.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.7%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations
Updates - 12.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.60%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations
Updates - 4.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.69%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.49%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations
Updates - 4.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.41%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations
Updates - 9.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.54%
4 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations
Updates - 11.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations
Updates - 4.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations
Updates - 10.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.97%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations
Updates - 9.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations
Updates - 3.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.91%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations
Updates - 3.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.78%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.93%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.39%
5 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations
Updates - 9.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.77%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations
Updates - 9.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.79%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations
Updates - 8.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.82%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations
Updates - 3.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.78%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations
Updates - 7.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.81%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.80%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations
Updates - 5.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.29%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.28%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations
Updates - 5.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch adds test cases for bpf bloom filter maps. They include tests
checking against invalid operations by userspace, tests for using the
bloom filter map as an inner map, and a bpf program that queries the
bloom filter map for values added by a userspace program.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-4-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch delete ns_src/ns_dst/ns_redir namespaces before recreating
them, making the test more robust.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-5-fallentree@fb.com
This patch makes attach_probe uses its own method as attach point,
avoiding conflict with other tests like bpf_cookie.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-4-fallentree@fb.com
Increase memory to 4G, 8 SMP core with host cpu passthrough. This
make it run faster in parallel mode and more likely to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-2-fallentree@fb.com
Function in modules could appear in /proc/kallsyms in random order.
ffffffffa02608a0 t bpf_testmod_loop_test
ffffffffa02600c0 t __traceiter_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare
ffffffffa0263b60 d __tracepoint_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare
ffffffffa02608c0 T bpf_testmod_test_read
ffffffffa0260d08 t __SCT__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare
ffffffffa0263300 d __SCK__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_read
ffffffffa0260680 T bpf_testmod_test_write
ffffffffa0260860 t bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc
Therefore, we cannot reliably use kallsyms_find_next() to find the end of
a function. Replace it with a simple guess (start + 128). This is good
enough for this test.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022234814.318457-1-songliubraving@fb.com
Skipping the second half of the test is not enough to silent the warning
in dmesg. Skip the whole test before we can either properly silent the
warning in kernel, or fix LBR snapshot for VM.
Fixes: 025bd7c753 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot")
Fixes: aa67fdb464 ("selftests/bpf: Skip the second half of get_branch_snapshot in vm")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026000733.477714-1-songliubraving@fb.com
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined
__BYTE_ORDER for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-6-iii@linux.ibm.com
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined
__BYTE_ORDER for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-4-iii@linux.ibm.com
Instead of using subtests in bpf_verif_scale selftest, turn each scale
sub-test into its own test. Each subtest is compltely independent and
just reuses a bit of common test running logic, so the conversion is
trivial. For convenience, keep all of BPF verifier scale tests in one
file.
This conversion shaves off a significant amount of time when running
test_progs in parallel mode. E.g., just running scale tests (-t verif_scale):
BEFORE
======
Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 0m22.894s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m22.797s
AFTER
=====
Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 0m12.044s
user 0m0.024s
sys 0m27.869s
Ten second saving right there. test_progs -j is not yet ready to be
turned on by default, unfortunately, and some tests fail almost every
time, but this is a good improvement nevertheless. Ignoring few
failures, here is sequential vs parallel run times when running all
tests now:
SEQUENTIAL
==========
Summary: 206/953 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
real 1m5.625s
user 0m4.211s
sys 0m31.650s
PARALLEL
========
Summary: 204/952 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED
real 0m35.550s
user 0m4.998s
sys 0m39.890s
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-5-andrii@kernel.org
It seems to cause a lot of harm to kprobe/tracepoint selftests. Yucong
mentioned before that it does manipulate sysfs, which might be the
reason. So let's mark it as serial, though ideally it would be less
intrusive on the system at test.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-4-andrii@kernel.org
Revamp how test discovery works for test_progs and allow multiple test
entries per file. Any global void function with no arguments and
serial_test_ or test_ prefix is considered a test.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-3-andrii@kernel.org
Ensure that all test entry points are global void functions with no
input arguments. Mark few subtest entry points as static.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-2-andrii@kernel.org
Add unit tests for deduplication of BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG to typedef types.
Also changed a few comments from "tag" to "decl_tag" to match
BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG enum value name.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195638.4019770-1-yhs@fb.com
- update custom loader to search by name, not section name
- update bpftool commands to use proper pin path
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021214814.1236114-4-sdf@google.com
Replace the calls to btf__get_nr_types/btf__get_raw_data in
selftests with new APIs btf__type_cnt/btf__raw_data. The old
APIs will be deprecated in libbpf v0.7+.
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022130623.1548429-6-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer
selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]):
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument
It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for
this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's
hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to
help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this.
For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce
amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use
explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because
global data isn't yet supported there.
Fixes: aa274f98b2 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org
Utilize libbpf's feature of allowing to lookup internal maps by their
ELF section names. No need to guess or calculate the exact truncated
prefix taken from the object name.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021014404.2635234-11-andrii@kernel.org
Enhance existing selftests to demonstrate the use of custom
.data/.rodata sections.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021014404.2635234-9-andrii@kernel.org
The perf buffer tests triggers trace with nanosleep syscall,
but monitors all syscalls, which results in lot of data in the
buffer and makes it harder to debug. Let's lower the trace
traffic and monitor just nanosleep syscall.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-4-jolsa@kernel.org
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:
# test_progs -t perf_buffer
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
skipping offline CPU #4
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:buf_cnt 0 nsec
...
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:fd_check 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:drain_buf 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:consume_buf 0 nsec
serial_test_perf_buffer:FAIL:cpu_seen cpu 5 not seen
#88 perf_buffer:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
If the offline cpu is from the middle of the possible set,
we get mismatch with possible and online cpu buffers.
The perf buffer test calls perf_buffer__consume_buffer for
all 'possible' cpus, but the library holds only 'online'
cpu buffers and perf_buffer__consume_buffer returns them
based on index.
Adding extra (online) index to keep track of online buffers,
we need the original (possible) index to trigger trace on
proper cpu.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-3-jolsa@kernel.org
verified_insns field was added to response of bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd
call on a prog. Confirm that it's being populated by loading a simple
program and asking for its info.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211020074818.1017682-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Some new verifier tests that hit some important gaps in the parameter
space for atomic ops.
There are already exhaustive tests for the JIT part in
lib/test_bpf.c, but these exercise the verifier too.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211015093318.1273686-1-jackmanb@google.com
cpu_number exists only on Intel and aarch64, so skip the test involing
it on other arches. An alternative would be to replace it with an
exported non-ifdefed primitive-typed percpu variable from the common
code, but there appears to be none.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211013160902.428340-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
Fix following checkincludes.pl warning:
./scripts/checkincludes.pl tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c: unistd.h is included more
than once.
Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012023231.19911-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com
Patch set [1] introduced BTF_KIND_TAG to allow tagging
declarations for struct/union, struct/union field, var, func
and func arguments and these tags will be encoded into
dwarf. They are also encoded to btf by llvm for the bpf target.
After BTF_KIND_TAG is introduced, we intended to use it
for kernel __user attributes. But kernel __user is actually
a type attribute. Upstream and internal discussion showed
it is not a good idea to mix declaration attribute and
type attribute. So we proposed to introduce btf_type_tag
as a type attribute and existing btf_tag renamed to
btf_decl_tag ([2]).
This patch renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG and some
other declarations with *_tag to *_decl_tag to make it clear
the tag is for declaration. In the future, BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
might be introduced per [3].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223004.244411-1-yhs@fb.com/
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588
[3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
Fixes: b5ea834dde ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG")
Fixes: 5b84bd1036 ("libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG")
Fixes: 5c07f2fec0 ("bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012164838.3345699-1-yhs@fb.com
The verifier tests added in commit c48e51c8b0 ("bpf: selftests: Add
selftests for module kfunc support") fail on s390, since the JIT does
not support calling kernel functions. This is most likely an issue for
all the other non-Intel arches, as well as on Intel with
!CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF or !CONFIG_BPF_JIT.
Trying to check for messages from all the possible add_kfunc_call()
failure cases in test_verifier looks pointless, so do a much simpler
thing instead: just like it's already done in do_prog_test_run(), skip
the tests that fail to load with ENOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007173329.381754-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() returns u64, whose upper 32 bits are the same
as userspace getpid() return value.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-13-fallentree@fb.com
This patch make each worker use a unique cgroup base directory, thus
allowing tests that uses cgroups to run concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-5-fallentree@fb.com
This patch allows tests to define serial_test_name() instead of
test_name(), and this will make test_progs execute those in sequence
after all other tests finished executing concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-3-fallentree@fb.com
This patch adds "-j" mode to test_progs, executing tests in multiple
process. "-j" mode is optional, and works with all existing test
selection mechanism, as well as "-v", "-l" etc.
In "-j" mode, main process use UDS/SEQPACKET to communicate to each forked
worker, commanding it to run tests and collect logs. After all tests are
finished, a summary is printed. main process use multiple competing
threads to dispatch work to worker, trying to keep them all busy.
The test status will be printed as soon as it is finished, if there are
error logs, it will be printed after the final summary line.
By specifying "--debug", additional debug information on server/worker
communication will be printed.
Example output:
> ./test_progs -n 15-20 -j
[ 12.801730] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
Launching 8 workers.
#20 btf_split:OK
#16 btf_endian:OK
#18 btf_module:OK
#17 btf_map_in_map:OK
#19 btf_skc_cls_ingress:OK
#15 btf_dump:OK
Summary: 6/20 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-2-fallentree@fb.com
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and
trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod
with a specific buffer length. The reading will return
the value in writable context if the early return flag
is enabled in writable context.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
