smatch gives the warning:
drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-srv.c:1805 rtrs_rdma_connect() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'
Which is trying to say smatch has shown that srv is not an error pointer
and thus cannot be passed to PTR_ERR.
The solution is to move the list_add() down after full initilization of
rtrs_srv. To avoid holding the srv_mutex too long, only hold it during the
list operation as suggested by Leon.
Fixes: 03e9b33a0f ("RDMA/rtrs: Only allow addition of path to an already established session")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210216143807.65923-1-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
put_device() decreases the ref-count and then the device will be
cleaned-up, while at is also add missing put_device in
rtrs_srv_create_once_sysfs_root_folders
This patch solves a kmemleak error as below:
unreferenced object 0xffff88809a7a0710 (size 8):
comm "kworker/4:1H", pid 113, jiffies 4295833049 (age 6212.380s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
62 6c 61 00 6b 6b 6b a5 bla.kkk.
backtrace:
[<0000000054413611>] kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
[<0000000078e3120a>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x2f/0xb0
[<00000000f1a17a6b>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
[<00000000d5502e32>] rtrs_srv_create_sess_files+0x2fb/0x314 [rtrs_server]
[<00000000ed11a1ef>] rtrs_srv_info_req_done+0x631/0x800 [rtrs_server]
[<000000008fc5aa8f>] __ib_process_cq+0x94/0x100 [ib_core]
[<00000000a9599cb4>] ib_cq_poll_work+0x32/0xc0 [ib_core]
[<00000000cfc376be>] process_one_work+0x4bc/0x980
[<0000000016e5c96a>] worker_thread+0x78/0x5c0
[<00000000c20b8be0>] kthread+0x191/0x1e0
[<000000006c9c0003>] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Fixes: baa5b28b7a ("RDMA/rtrs-srv: Replace device_register with device_initialize and device_add")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212134525.103456-5-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
kmemleak reported an error as below:
unreferenced object 0xffff8880674b7640 (size 64):
comm "kworker/4:1H", pid 113, jiffies 4296403507 (age 507.840s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
69 70 3a 31 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 31 32 32 2e 31 ip:192.168.122.1
31 30 40 69 70 3a 31 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 31 32 10@ip:192.168.12
backtrace:
[<0000000054413611>] kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
[<0000000078e3120a>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x2f/0xb0
[<00000000ca2be3ee>] kobject_init_and_add+0xb0/0x120
[<0000000062ba5e78>] rtrs_srv_create_sess_files+0x14c/0x314 [rtrs_server]
[<00000000b45b7217>] rtrs_srv_info_req_done+0x5b1/0x800 [rtrs_server]
[<000000008fc5aa8f>] __ib_process_cq+0x94/0x100 [ib_core]
[<00000000a9599cb4>] ib_cq_poll_work+0x32/0xc0 [ib_core]
[<00000000cfc376be>] process_one_work+0x4bc/0x980
[<0000000016e5c96a>] worker_thread+0x78/0x5c0
[<00000000c20b8be0>] kthread+0x191/0x1e0
[<000000006c9c0003>] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
It is caused by the not-freed kobject of rtrs_srv_sess. The kobject
embedded in rtrs_srv_sess has ref-counter 2 after calling
process_info_req(). Therefore it must call kobject_put twice. Currently
it calls kobject_put only once at rtrs_srv_destroy_sess_files because
kobject_del removes the state_in_sysfs flag and then kobject_put in
free_sess() is not called.
This patch moves kobject_del() into free_sess() so that the kobject of
rtrs_srv_sess can be freed. And also this patch adds the missing call of
sysfs_remove_group() to clean-up the sysfs directory.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212134525.103456-4-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
While adding a path from the client side to an already established
session, it was possible to provide the destination IP to a different
server. This is dangerous.
This commit adds an extra member to the rtrs_msg_conn_req structure, named
first_conn; which is supposed to notify if the connection request is the
first for that session or not.
On the server side, if a session does not exist but the first_conn
received inside the rtrs_msg_conn_req structure is 1, the connection
request is failed. This signifies that the connection request is for an
already existing session, and since the server did not find one, it is an
wrong connection request.
Fixes: 6a98d71dae ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality")
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212134525.103456-3-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Lutz Pogrell <lutz.pogrell@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in _mlx4_ib_post_send+0x1bd2/0x2770 [mlx4_ib]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880d5a7f980 by task kworker/0:1H/565
CPU: 0 PID: 565 Comm: kworker/0:1H Tainted: G O 5.4.84-storage #5.4.84-1+feature+linux+5.4.y+dbg+20201216.1319+b6b887b~deb10
Hardware name: Supermicro H8QG6/H8QG6, BIOS 3.00 09/04/2012
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x96/0xe0
print_address_description.constprop.4+0x1f/0x300
? irq_work_claim+0x2e/0x50
__kasan_report.cold.8+0x78/0x92
? _mlx4_ib_post_send+0x1bd2/0x2770 [mlx4_ib]
kasan_report+0x10/0x20
_mlx4_ib_post_send+0x1bd2/0x2770 [mlx4_ib]
? check_chain_key+0x1d7/0x2e0
? _mlx4_ib_post_recv+0x630/0x630 [mlx4_ib]
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x1a8/0x290
? stack_depot_save+0x218/0x56e
? do_profile_hits.isra.6.cold.13+0x1d/0x1d
? check_chain_key+0x1d7/0x2e0
? save_stack+0x4d/0x80
? save_stack+0x19/0x80
? __kasan_slab_free+0x125/0x170
? kfree+0xe7/0x3b0
rdma_write_sg+0x5b0/0x950 [rtrs_server]
The problem is when we send imm_wr, the type should be ib_rdma_wr, so hw
driver like mlx4 can do rdma_wr(wr), so fix it by use the ib_rdma_wr as
type for imm_wr.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212134525.103456-2-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Currently rtrs when create_qp use a coarse numbers (bigger in general),
which leads to hardware create more resources which only waste memory
with no benefits.
- SERVICE con,
For max_send_wr/max_recv_wr, it's 2 times SERVICE_CON_QUEUE_DEPTH + 2
- IO con
For max_send_wr/max_recv_wr, it's sess->queue_depth * 3 + 1
Fixes: 6a98d71dae ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217141915.56989-6-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Previously the rnbd client requested the rtrs to allocate rnbd_iu
just after the rtrs_iu. So the rnbd client passes the size of
rnbd_iu for rtrs_clt_open() and rtrs creates an array of
rnbd_iu and rtrs_iu.
For IO handling, rnbd_iu exists after the request because we pass
the size of rnbd_iu when setting the tag-set. Therefore we do not
use the rnbd_iu allocated by rtrs for IO handling.
We only use the rnbd_iu allocated by rtrs when doing session
initialization. Almost all rnbd_iu allocated by rtrs are wasted.
By this patch the rnbd client does not request rnbd_iu allocation
to rtrs but allocate it for itself when doing session initialization.
Also remove unused rtrs_permit_to_pdu from rtrs.
Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The purpose of srv_mutex is to protect srv_list as in put_srv, so no need
to hold it when allocate memory for srv since it could be time consuming.
Otherwise if one machine has limited memory, rsrv_close_work could be
blocked for a longer time due to the mutex is held by get_or_create_srv
since it can't get memory in time.
INFO: task kworker/1:1:27478 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Tainted: G O 4.14.171-1-storage #4.14.171-1.3~deb9
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/1:1 D 0 27478 2 0x80000000
Workqueue: rtrs_server_wq rtrs_srv_close_work [rtrs_server]
Call Trace:
? __schedule+0x38c/0x7e0
schedule+0x32/0x80
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
__mutex_lock.isra.2+0x25e/0x4d0
? put_srv+0x44/0x100 [rtrs_server]
put_srv+0x44/0x100 [rtrs_server]
rtrs_srv_close_work+0x16c/0x280 [rtrs_server]
process_one_work+0x1c5/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x47/0x3e0
kthread+0xfc/0x130
? trace_event_raw_event_workqueue_execute_start+0xa0/0xa0
? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Let's move all the logics from __find_srv_and_get and __alloc_srv to
get_or_create_srv, and remove the two functions. Then it should be safe
for multiple processes to access the same srv since it is protected with
srv_mutex.
And since we don't want to allocate chunks with srv_mutex held, let's
check the srv->refcount after get srv because the chunks could not be
allocated yet.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023074353.21946-6-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
It could happen two kworkers race with each other:
CPU0 CPU1
addr_resolver kworker reconnect kworker
rtrs_clt_rdma_cm_handler
rtrs_rdma_addr_resolved
create_con_cq_qp: s.dev_ref++
"s.dev_ref is 1"
wait in create_cm fails with TIMEOUT
destroy_con_cq_qp: --s.dev_ref
"s.dev_ref is 0"
destroy_con_cq_qp: sess->s.dev = NULL
rtrs_cq_qp_create -> create_qp(con, sess->dev->ib_pd...)
sess->dev is NULL, panic.
To fix the problem using mutex to serialize create_con_cq_qp and
destroy_con_cq_qp.
Fixes: 6a98d71dae ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023074353.21946-4-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
There are two flows for handling RDMA_CM_EVENT_ROUTE_RESOLVED, either the
handler triggers a completion and another thread does rdma_connect() or
the handler directly calls rdma_connect().
In all cases rdma_connect() needs to hold the handler_mutex, but when
handler's are invoked this is already held by the core code. This causes
ULPs using the 2nd method to deadlock.
Provide a rdma_connect_locked() and have all ULPs call it from their
handlers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v2-53c22d5c1405+33-rdma_connect_locking_jgg@nvidia.com
Reported-and-tested-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Fixes: 2a7cec5381 ("RDMA/cma: Fix locking for the RDMA_CM_CONNECT state")
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Leon Romanovsky says:
====================
IBTA declares speed as 16 bits, but kernel stores it in u8. This series
fixes in-kernel declaration while keeping external interface intact.
====================
Based on the mlx5-next branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux
due to dependencies.
* branch 'mlx5_active_speed':
RDMA: Fix link active_speed size
RDMA/mlx5: Delete duplicated mlx5_ptys_width enum
net/mlx5: Refactor query port speed functions
The rnbd_server module's communication manager (cm) initialization depends
on the registration of the "network namespace subsystem" of the RDMA CM
agent module. As such, when the kernel is configured to load the
rnbd_server and the RDMA cma module during initialization; and if the
rnbd_server module is initialized before RDMA cma module, a null ptr
dereference occurs during the RDMA bind operation.
Call trace:
Call Trace:
? xas_load+0xd/0x80
xa_load+0x47/0x80
cma_ps_find+0x44/0x70
rdma_bind_addr+0x782/0x8b0
? get_random_bytes+0x35/0x40
rtrs_srv_cm_init+0x50/0x80
rtrs_srv_open+0x102/0x180
? rnbd_client_init+0x6e/0x6e
rnbd_srv_init_module+0x34/0x84
? rnbd_client_init+0x6e/0x6e
do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x200
kernel_init_freeable+0x1f1/0x26e
? rest_init+0xb0/0xb0
kernel_init+0xe/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Modules linked in:
CR2: 0000000000000015
All this happens cause the cm init is in the call chain of the module
init, which is not a preferred practice.
So remove the call to rdma_create_id() from the module init call chain.
Instead register rtrs-srv as an ib client, which makes sure that the
rdma_create_id() is called only when an ib device is added.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907103106.104530-1-haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
The device .release function was not being set during the device
initialization. This was leading to the below warning, in error cases when
put_srv was called before device_add was called.
Warning:
Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must
be fixed. See Documentation/kobject.txt.
So, set the device .release function during device initialization in the
__alloc_srv() function.
Fixes: baa5b28b7a ("RDMA/rtrs-srv: Replace device_register with device_initialize and device_add")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907102216.104041-1-haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
There are error cases when we will call free_srv before device kobject is
initialized; in such cases calling put_device generates the following
warning:
kobject: '(null)' (000000009f5445ed): is not initialized, yet
kobject_put() is being called.
So call device_initialize() only once when the server is allocated. If we
end up calling put_srv() and subsequently free_srv(), our call to
put_device() would result in deletion of the obj. Call device_add() later
when we actually have a connection. Correspondingly, call device_del()
instead of device_unregister() when srv->dev_ref falls to 0.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200811092722.2450-1-haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
lockdep triggers a warning from time to time when running a regression
test:
rnbd_client L685: </dev/nullb0@bla> Device disconnected.
rnbd_client L1756: Unloading module
workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM rtrs_client_wq:rtrs_clt_reconnect_work [rtrs_client] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM ib_addr:process_one_req [ib_core]
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 18824 at kernel/workqueue.c:2517 check_flush_dependency+0xad/0x130
The root cause is workqueue core expect flushing should not be done for a
!WQ_MEM_RECLAIM wq from a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue.
In above case ib_addr workqueue without WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, but rtrs_wq
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.
To avoid the warning, remove the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag.
Fixes: 9cb8374804 ("RDMA/rtrs: server: main functionality")
Fixes: 6a98d71dae ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724111508.15734-4-haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
IBTA declares "vendor option not supported" reject reason in REJ messages
if passive side doesn't want to accept proposed ECE options.
Due to the fact that ECE is managed by userspace, there is a need to let
users to provide such rejected reason.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526103304.196371-7-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
