Silence the following warning:
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/net2280.c:3176:33: warning: context imbalance in
'handle_stat1_irqs' - unexpected unlock
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
net2280_start can be called with pullup disabled. Don't set
softconnect flag in it. Let net2280_pullup handle the connection part.
Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Hopefully, these prints will help localize the problems faster.
[ balbi@ti.com: removed 2 unnecessary OOM error messages ]
Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Remove fiforegs from struct net2280 and net2280_ep as it is unused.
By the way, ep->fiforegs = &dev->fiforegs[i] assignment is incorrect.
It should be ep->fiforegs = &dev->fiforegs[ne[i]], but it doesn't
matter now.
Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Each struct usb_ep added for net2280 can be used in either direction.
Whereas, each struct usb_ep for usb3380 has fixed direction. Use
ep_autoconf compatible names so that endpoint with correct direction
can be selected.
Name sequence is due to the logic in usb_reinit_338x() in ne[] and
ep_reg_addr[].
Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
we can also have babble conditions with LS/FS
and we also want to recover in that case.
Because of that we will drop the check of HSMODE
and always try to run babble recovery.
Suggested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
There's no point is splitting those anymore.
We're now also able to drop another forward
declaration.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
that's not needed anymore. Everything that we
call is irq-safe, so we might as well not
have a delayed work for babble recovery.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
recover is a much better name than reset, considering
we don't really reset the IP, just run platform-specific
babble recovery algorithm.
while at that, also fix a typo in comment and add kdoc
for recover memeber of platform_ops.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
we're not resetting musb at all, just restarting
the session. This means we don't need to touch PHYs
or VBUS or anything like that. Just make sure session
bit is reenabled after MUSB dropped it.
while at that, make sure to tell usbcore that we're
dropping the session and, thus, disconnecting the
device.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
All we have to do is, really, drop session bit
and let the session restart.
Big thanks goes to Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> for
inspiring this work.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
When babble IRQ happens, we need to wait only
5.3us (320 cycles of 60MHz clock), we will give
it some slack and schedule our work a 10 usecs into
the future.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
We do *not* want to touch devctl at all when
trying to recover from babble. All we want to
do is mask IRQs until we're done without our
babble recovery, at which point we will unmask
IRQs.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
sometimes we want to just mask/unmask interrupts
without touching devctl register. For those
cases, let's introduce musb_enable_interrupts and
musb_disable_interrupts()
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Whenever babble happens, MUSB controller will
drop session automatically.
The only case where it won't drop the session,
is when we're running on AM335x and SW_SESSION_CTRL
bit has been set. In that case, controller will
not touch session bit so SW has a chance to recover
from babble condition.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
We want to check if that particular bit is
set. It could very well be that bootloader
(or romcode) has fiddled with MUSB before
us which could leave other bits set in this
register.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
musb->int_usb already contains the correct
information for musb-core to handle babble.
In fact, this very check was just causing a
nonsensical babble interrupt storm.
With this I can get test.sh to run and, even though
all tests fail with timeout, that's still better
than locking up the system due to IRQ storm.
Also, if I remove g_zero and load g_mass_storage,
then everything works fine again.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
when musb is operating as host and a remote wakeup
fires up, a resume interrupt will be raised. At that
point SUSPENDM bit is automatically cleared and
RESUME bit is automatically set.
Remove those two from IRQ handler.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
There was already a proper place where we were
checking for babble interrupts, move babble
recovery there.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
if reset fails, we should return a *negative*
error code, not a positive value.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
FSDEV is set for both HIGH and FULL speeds,
the correct HIGHSPEED check is done through
power register's HSMODE bit.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
devctl & MUSB_DEVCTL_HM represents a single bit,
just check for the bit, there's really no need
to compare the result against 0.
Tested-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
As per the SAF1761 data sheet[0], the DcChipID register represents
the hardware version number (0001h) and the chip ID (1582h) for the
Peripheral Controller.
However as per the ISP1761 data sheet[1], the DcChipID register
represents the hardware version number (0015h) and the chip ID (8210h)
for the Peripheral Controller.
This patch adds support for both the chip ID values.
[0] http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/SAF1761.pdf
[1] http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheets2/74/742102_1.pdf
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Removed FIXME from usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c by moving definition of
PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS shared with usb/dwc2 to linux/pci_ids.h.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
The seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.
See: commit 1f33c41c03 ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
seq_has_overflowed() and make public")
While there, simplify the error handler logic by returning
immediately and remove the unnecessary labels.
Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Change the return value of lynx_accel to be void, to fix the build
warning, and due to the fact that the function can't seem to fail at
all, and no one cares if it does or not.
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Change the options to the proc_panDisplay function pointer to match the
function pointer that we want to assign to it, in order to remove the
build warning.
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
This patch assigns the more appropriate void* type to the mmio750 variable
eliminating an unnecessary volatile qualifier in the process. Additionally it
updates parameter types as necessary where those parameters interact with
mmio750, removes unnecessary casts and updates the type of the
lynx_share->pvReg field which is passed to the ddk750_set_mmio method.
As a consequence, this patch fixes the following sparse warning:-
drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_help.c:12:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in scriptcoccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Madhusudhanan Ravindran <mravindran04@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fixed the build warning about comparison of pointer and integer.
end of string was being compared to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
