If we're about to send the first layoutget for an empty layout, we want
to make sure that we drain out the existing pending layoutget calls
first. The reason is that these layouts may have been already implicitly
returned to the server by a recall to which the client gave a
NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT response.
The problem is that wait_var_event_killable() could in principle see the
plh_outstanding count go back to '1' when the first process to wake up
starts sending a new layoutget. If it fails to get a layout, then this
loop can continue ad infinitum...
Fixes: 0b77f97a7e ("NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If the server tells us that a pNFS layout is not available for a
specific file, then we should not keep pounding it with further
layoutget requests.
Fixes: 183d9e7b11 ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Commit 587f03deb6 caused pnfs_update_layout() to stop returning ENOMEM
when the memory allocation fails, and hence causes it to fall back to
trying to do I/O through the MDS. There is no guarantee that this will
fare any better. If we're failing the pNFS layout allocation, then we
should just redirty the page and retry later.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Fixes: 587f03deb6 ("pnfs: refactor send_layoutget")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
In nfs4_callback_devicenotify(), if we don't find a matching entry for
the deviceid, we're left with a pointer to 'struct nfs_server' that
actually points to the list of super blocks associated with our struct
nfs_client.
Furthermore, even if we have a valid pointer, nothing pins the super
block, and so the struct nfs_server could end up getting freed while
we're using it.
Since all we want is a pointer to the struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type,
let's skip all the iteration over super blocks, and just use APIs to
find the layout driver directly.
Reported-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Fixes: 1be5683b03 ("pnfs: CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Ensure that pNFS allocations that can be called from rpciod/nfsiod
callback can fail in low memory mode, so that the threads don't block
and loop forever.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Assume that sections that should not re-enter the filesystem are already
protected with memalloc_nofs_save/restore call, so relax those GFP_NOFS
instances which might be used by other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
The intention of the layout barrier is to ensure that we do not update
the layout to match an older value than the current expectation. Fix the
test in pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked() to reflect that it is legal for
the seqid of the stateid to match that of the barrier.
Fixes: aa95edf309 ("NFSv4/pnfs: Fix the layout barrier update")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
A zero value for the layout barrier indicates that it has been cleared
(since seqid '0' is an illegal value), so we should always allow it to
be updated.
Fixes: d29b468da4 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Since commit 2b28a7bee4 ("fs, nfs: convert
pnfs_layout_hdr.plh_refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t") it has not
been legal to bump a zero refcount, so the code that tries to allow it
if the NFS_LSEG_VALID flag is still set would cause trouble. Luckily,
NFS_LSEG_VALID has its own refcount so we can never hit this bad code
snippet in practice. Remove it to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED is set, but there is no value set for
the layout plh_return_seq, we can end up in a livelock loop in which
every layout segment retrieved by a new call to layoutget is immediately
invalidated by pnfs_layout_need_return().
To get around this, we should just set plh_return_seq to the current
value of the layout stateid's seqid.
Fixes: d474f96104 ("NFS: Don't return layout segments that are in use")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Cache the layout in the arguments so we don't have to keep looking it up
from the inode.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the layout gets invalidated, we should wait for any outstanding
layoutget requests for that layout to complete, and we should resend
them only after re-establishing the layout stateid.
Fixes: d29b468da4 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If we have multiple outstanding layoutget requests, the current code to
update the layout barrier assumes that the outstanding layout stateids
are updated in order. That's not necessarily the case.
Instead of using the value of lo->plh_outstanding as a guesstimate for
the window of values we need to accept, just wait to update the window
until we're processing the last one. The intention here is just to
ensure that we don't process 2^31 seqid updates without also updating
the barrier.
Fixes: 1bcf34fdac ("pNFS/NFSv4: Update the layout barrier when we schedule a layoutreturn")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Commit de144ff423 changes _pnfs_return_layout() to call
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() passing NULL as the struct
pnfs_layout_range argument. Unfortunately,
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() doesn't check if we have a value here
before dereferencing it, causing an oops.
I'm able to hit this crash consistently when running connectathon basic
tests on NFS v4.1/v4.2 against Ontap.
Fixes: de144ff423 ("NFSv4: Don't discard segments marked for return in _pnfs_return_layout()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Variable 'rd_size' is being initialized however
this value is never read as 'rd_size' is assigned
a new value in for statement. Remove the redundant
assignment.
Clean up clang warning:
fs/nfs/pnfs.c:2681:6: warning: Value stored to 'rd_size' during its
initialization is never read [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the server hands us a layout that does not match the one we currently
hold, then have pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() just ditch the old
layout if NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN is not set.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the pNFS layout segment is marked with the NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN
flag, then the assumption is that it has some reporting requirement
to perform through a layoutreturn (e.g. flexfiles layout stats or error
information).
Fixes: 6d597e1750 ("pnfs: only tear down lsegs that precede seqid in LAYOUTRETURN args")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the pNFS layout segment is marked with the NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN
flag, then the assumption is that it has some reporting requirement
to perform through a layoutreturn (e.g. flexfiles layout stats or error
information).
Fixes: e0b7d420f7 ("pNFS: Don't discard layout segments that are marked for return")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough
statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next
case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If a layoutget ends up being reordered w.r.t. a layoutreturn, e.g. due
to a layoutget-on-open not knowing a priori which file to lock, then we
must assume the layout is no longer being considered valid state by the
server.
Incrementally improve our ability to reject such states by using the
cached old stateid in conjunction with the plh_barrier to try to
identify them.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When we're scheduling a layoutreturn, we need to ignore any further
incoming layouts with sequence ids that are going to be affected by the
layout return.
Fixes: 44ea8dfce0 ("NFS/pnfs: Reference the layout cred in pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the server returns a new stateid that does not match the one in our
cache, then try to return the one we hold instead of just invalidating
it on the client side. This ensures that both client and server will
agree that the stateid is invalid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the server returns a new stateid that does not match the one in our
cache, then pnfs_layout_process() will leak the layout segments returned
by pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid().
Fixes: 9888d837f3 ("pNFS: Force a retry of LAYOUTGET if the stateid doesn't match our cache")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If we exit _lgopen_prepare_attached() without setting a layout, we will
currently leak the plh_outstanding counter.
Fixes: 411ae722d1 ("pNFS: Wait for stale layoutget calls to complete in pnfs_update_layout()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If a layout return is in progress, we should wait for it to complete,
in case the layout segment we are picking up gets returned too.
Fixes: 30cb3ee299 ("pNFS: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID on layoutreturn by bumping the state seqid")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the inode is being evicted, it should be safe to run return-on-close,
so we should do it to ensure we don't inadvertently leak layout segments.
Fixes: 1c5bd76d17 ("pNFS: Enable layoutreturn operation for return-on-close")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the layout return-on-close failed because the layoutreturn was never
sent, then we should mark the layout for return again.
Fixes: 9c47b18cf7 ("pNFS: Ensure we do clear the return-on-close layout stateid on fatal errors")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When returning the layout in nfs4_evict_inode(), we need to ensure that
the layout is actually done being freed before we can proceed to free the
inode itself.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
The current mirrored read failover code is correctly resetting the mirror
index between failed reads, however it is not able to actually flip the
RPC call over to the next RPC client.
The end result is that we keep resending the RPC call to the same client
over and over.
The fix is to use the pnfs_read_resend_pnfs() mechanism to schedule a
new RPC call, but we need to add the ability to pass in a mirror
index so that we always retry the next mirror in the list.
Fixes: 166bd5b889 ("pNFS/flexfiles: Fix layoutstats handling during read failovers")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED flag is set, we want to return the
layout as soon as possible, meaning that the affected layout segments
should be marked as invalid, and should no longer be in use for I/O.
Fixes: f0b429819b ("pNFS: Ignore non-recalled layouts in pnfs_layout_need_return()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the layout segment is still in use for a read or a write, we should
not move it to the layout plh_return_segs list. If we do, we can end
up returning the layout while I/O is still in progress.
Fixes: e0b7d420f7 ("pNFS: Don't discard layout segments that are marked for return")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Ensure we correctly report the stateid and status in the layoutreturn on
close tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the credential returned by pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn()
does not match the credential of the RPC call, then we do
end up calling pnfs_send_layoutreturn() with that credential,
so don't free it!
Fixes: 44ea8dfce0 ("NFS/pnfs: Reference the layout cred in pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
We require that any outstanding layout return completes before we can
free up the inode so that the layout itself can be freed.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
We need to drop the inode spinlock while calling nfs4_select_rw_stateid(),
since nfs4_copy_delegation_stateid() could take the delegation lock.
Note that it is safe to do this, since all other calls to
pnfs_update_layout() for that inode will find themselves blocked by
the lock we hold on NFS_LAYOUT_FIRST_LAYOUTGET.
Fixes: fc51b1cf39 ("NFS: Beware when dereferencing the delegation cred")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When we're sending a layoutreturn, ensure that we reference the
layout cred atomically with the copy of the stateid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When starting to read or write with a layout segment, check that the
range matches our request.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Ensure that both the file and flexfiles layout types clean up when
freeing the layout segments.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When we receive a CB_RECALL_ANY that asks us to return flexfiles
layouts, we iterate through all the layouts and look at whether or
not there are active open file descriptors that might need them
for I/O. If there are no such descriptors, we return the layouts.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the cred assigned to the layout that we're updating differs from
the one used to retrieve the new layout segment, then we need to
update the layout plh_lc_cred field.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
When comparing two 'struct cred' for equality w.r.t. behaviour under
filesystem access, we need to use cred_fscmp().
Fixes: a52458b48a ("NFS/NFSD/SUNRPC: replace generic creds with 'struct cred'.")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Ever since the commit 0e0cb35b41, it's possible to lose an open stateid
while retrying a CLOSE due to ERR_OLD_STATEID. Once that happens,
operations that require openstateid fail with EAGAIN which is propagated
to the application then tests like generic/446 and generic/168 fail with
"Resource temporarily unavailable".
Instead of returning this error, initiate state recovery when possible to
recover the open stateid and then try calling nfs4_select_rw_stateid()
again.
Fixes: 0e0cb35b41 ("NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in CLOSE/OPEN_DOWNGRADE")
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
The current_stateid is exported from nfs4state.c but not
declared in any of the headers. Add to nfs4_fs.h to
remove the following warning:
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c:80:20: warning: symbol 'current_stateid' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If a LAYOUTRETURN receives a reply of NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID then assume we've
missed an update, and just bump the stateid.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
