leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mm: lru_cache_disable: replace work queue synchronization with synchronize_rcu

Browse Source 
On systems that run FIFO:1 applications that busy loop, any SCHED_OTHER
task that attempts to execute on such a CPU (such as work threads) will
not be scheduled, which leads to system hangs.

Commit d479960e44 ("mm: disable LRU pagevec during the migration
temporarily") relies on queueing work items on all online CPUs to ensure
visibility of lru_disable_count.

To fix this, replace the usage of work items with synchronize_rcu,
which provides the same guarantees.

Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling
preemption or rcu_read_lock:

  preempt_disable, local_irq_disable  [bh_lru_lock()]
  rcu_read_lock                       [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
  preempt_disable                     [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]

Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on
preempt_disable() regions of code.  So any CPU which sees
lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical section when
synchronize_rcu() returns.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yin7hDxdt0s/x+fp@fuller.cnet
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Marcelo Tosatti 2022-03-22 14:45:47 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 405cc51fc1
commit ff042f4a9b
1 changed files with 14 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
mm/swap.c
View File

@ -831,8 +831,7 @@ inline void __lru_add_drain_all(bool force_all_cpus)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu);
if (force_all_cpus ||
pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_add, cpu)) ||
if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_add, cpu)) ||
data_race(pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.pvec, cpu))) ||
pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate_file, cpu)) ||
pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate, cpu)) ||
@ -876,15 +875,21 @@ atomic_t lru_disable_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
void lru_cache_disable(void)
{
atomic_inc(&lru_disable_count);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* lru_add_drain_all in the force mode will schedule draining on
* all online CPUs so any calls of lru_cache_disabled wrapped by
* local_lock or preemption disabled would be ordered by that.
* The atomic operation doesn't need to have stronger ordering
* requirements because that is enforced by the scheduling
* guarantees.
* Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling
* preemption or rcu_read_lock:
*
* preempt_disable, local_irq_disable [bh_lru_lock()]
* rcu_read_lock [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
* preempt_disable [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
*
* Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on
* preempt_disable() regions of code. So any CPU which sees
* lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical
* section when synchronize_rcu() returns.
*/
synchronize_rcu();
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
__lru_add_drain_all(true);
#else
lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain();