forked from Minki/linux
Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM
When receiving a rfcomm connection with the old dund deamon a inconsistent lock state happens. That's because interrupts were already disabled by l2cap_conn_start() when rfcomm_sk_state_change() try to lock the spin_lock. As result we may have a inconsistent lock state for l2cap_conn_start() after rfcomm_sk_state_change() calls bh_lock_sock() and disable interrupts as well. [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] ================================= [ 2833.151999] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 2833.151999] 2.6.36-rc3 #2 [ 2833.151999] --------------------------------- [ 2833.151999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 2833.151999] krfcommd/2306 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 2833.151999] (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81094346>] __lock_acquire+0x5b6/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a5092>] l2cap_conn_start+0x92/0x640 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a6a3f>] l2cap_sig_channel+0x6bf/0x1320 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a9173>] l2cap_recv_frame+0x133/0x770 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a997b>] l2cap_recv_acldata+0x1cb/0x390 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa000db4b>] hci_rx_task+0x2ab/0x450 [bluetooth] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b22b>] tasklet_action+0xcb/0xe0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b91e>] __do_softirq+0xae/0x150 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102ddb5>] do_softirq+0x75/0xb0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b56d>] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8104484b>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6b/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102b6d3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81029dfa>] cpu_idle+0x5a/0xb0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81381ded>] rest_init+0xad/0xc0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817ebc4d>] start_kernel+0x2dd/0x2e8 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817eb2e6>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xf6/0xfa [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817eb3ce>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb [ 2833.151999] irq event stamp: 731 [ 2833.151999] hardirqs last enabled at (731): [<ffffffff8106b762>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xe0 [ 2833.151999] hardirqs last disabled at (729): [<ffffffff8106b93e>] __do_softirq+0xce/0x150 [ 2833.151999] softirqs last enabled at (730): [<ffffffff8106b96e>] __do_softirq+0xfe/0x150 [ 2833.151999] softirqs last disabled at (711): [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2833.151999] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2306: [ 2833.151999] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bb744>] rfcomm_run+0x174/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] #1: (&(&d->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b9223>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x53/0x100 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] stack backtrace: [ 2833.151999] Pid: 2306, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc3 #2 [ 2833.151999] Call Trace: [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810928e1>] print_usage_bug+0x171/0x180 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810936c3>] mark_lock+0x333/0x400 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810943ca>] __lock_acquire+0x63a/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810948b5>] ? __lock_acquire+0xb25/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00b9239>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x69/0x100 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00b9a49>] rfcomm_check_accept+0x59/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bacab>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x9fb/0x1320 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813932bb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x60 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81093acd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81093b1d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bb7f1>] rfcomm_run+0x221/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813905e7>] ? schedule+0x287/0x780 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bb5d0>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81081026>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bb14>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813936bc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81080f90>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bb10>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10 Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo F. Padovan
parent
ccbb84af28
commit
fad003b6c8
@ -82,11 +82,14 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_data_ready(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sock *sk = d->owner, *parent;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sk)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
bh_lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
@ -108,6 +111,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
|
||||
/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user