mtd: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correcting
capability is chosen.

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Richard Genoud 2013-07-30 17:17:29 +02:00 committed by David Woodhouse
parent 11f164d111
commit f666d6495a

View File

@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
return err_no;
}
if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");