leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

drm/i915: Remove redundant HAS_PSR checks

Browse Source 
We only need to check for this in psr_enable, everything else is
already protect by the dev_priv->psr.enabled checks. Those need the
psr locking, but these functions are called infrequent enough that the
locking overhead is negligible.

Suggested by Chris Wilson.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Vetter 2014-07-11 10:30:18 -07:00
parent fa128fa647
commit eeefa889cd
1 changed files with 0 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
View File

@ -1772,11 +1772,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
dev_priv->psr.source_ok = false;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR not supported on this platform\n");
return false;
}
if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && dig_port->port != PORT_A) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("HSW ties PSR to DDI A (eDP)\n");
return false;
@ -1863,9 +1858,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev))
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
@ -1940,9 +1932,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_invalidate(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
enum pipe pipe;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev))
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
@ -1967,9 +1956,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
enum pipe pipe;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev))
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);