From ec0ac8ad33189f81324948ee5dc72d3e1dc64682 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:41:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling
Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and
plain wrong, my fault.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Acked-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/um/drivers/line.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index 01d4ab6b0ef1..f75d7b05c481 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
int err;
- /* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
+ /* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
* IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
- spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
+ spin_lock(&line->lock);
err = flush_buffer(line);
if (err == 0) {
return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
line->head = line->buffer;
line->tail = line->buffer;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&line->lock);
if(tty == NULL)
return IRQ_NONE;