forked from Minki/linux
Merge branch 'selinux-nlmsg'
Nicolas Dichtel says: ==================== selinux: add some missing nlmsg commands It's not a critical issue, thus the patches are based on net-next. Patches are splitted because the 'Fixes' tag is not the same for all commands. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
commit
e85e85c85a
@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_route_perms[] =
|
|||||||
{ RTM_NEWMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
{ RTM_NEWMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
{ RTM_DELMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
{ RTM_DELMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
{ RTM_GETMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
{ RTM_GETMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
|
{ RTM_NEWNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
|
{ RTM_DELNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
|
{ RTM_GETNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_tcpdiag_perms[] =
|
static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_tcpdiag_perms[] =
|
||||||
@ -100,6 +103,10 @@ static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_xfrm_perms[] =
|
|||||||
{ XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
{ XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
{ XFRM_MSG_NEWAE, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
{ XFRM_MSG_NEWAE, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
{ XFRM_MSG_GETAE, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
{ XFRM_MSG_GETAE, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
|
{ XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
|
{ XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
|
{ XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
|
||||||
|
{ XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO, NETLINK_XFRM_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_audit_perms[] =
|
static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_audit_perms[] =
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user