From e5e6268f77badf18bd6ab435364cfe21c7396c31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Kepplinger Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:37:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: imx8mq: remove interconnect property from lcdif The mxsfb driver handling imx8mq lcdif doesn't yet request the interconnect bandwidth that's needed at runtime when the description is present in the DT node. So remove that description and bring it back when it's supported. Fixes: ad1abc8a03fd ("arm64: dts: imx8mq: Add interconnect for lcdif") Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi index 972766b67a15..71bf497f99c2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi @@ -524,8 +524,6 @@ <&clk IMX8MQ_VIDEO_PLL1>, <&clk IMX8MQ_VIDEO_PLL1_OUT>; assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <0>, <0>, <594000000>; - interconnects = <&noc IMX8MQ_ICM_LCDIF &noc IMX8MQ_ICS_DRAM>; - interconnect-names = "dram"; status = "disabled"; port@0 { From 737e65c7956795b3553781fb7bc82fce1c39503f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:45:41 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: imx6ull-pinfunc: Fix CSI_DATA07__ESAI_TX0 pad name According to the i.MX6ULL Reference Manual, pad CSI_DATA07 may have the ESAI_TX0 functionality, not ESAI_T0. Also, NXP's i.MX Config Tools 10.0 generates dtsi with the MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA07__ESAI_TX0 naming, so fix it accordingly. There are no devicetree users in mainline that use the old name, so just remove the old entry. Fixes: c201369d4aa5 ("ARM: dts: imx6ull: add imx6ull support") Reported-by: George Makarov Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h index eb025a9d4759..7328d4ef8559 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h @@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ #define MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA04__ESAI_TX_FS 0x01F4 0x0480 0x0000 0x9 0x0 #define MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA05__ESAI_TX_CLK 0x01F8 0x0484 0x0000 0x9 0x0 #define MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA06__ESAI_TX5_RX0 0x01FC 0x0488 0x0000 0x9 0x0 -#define MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA07__ESAI_T0 0x0200 0x048C 0x0000 0x9 0x0 +#define MX6ULL_PAD_CSI_DATA07__ESAI_TX0 0x0200 0x048C 0x0000 0x9 0x0 #endif /* __DTS_IMX6ULL_PINFUNC_H */ From 042b67799e2991e301df8269e166d8bc5944495e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Ford Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 06:50:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] soc: imx: imx8m-blk-ctrl: Fix imx8mm mipi reset Most of the blk-ctrl reset bits are found in one register, however there are two bits in offset 8 for pulling the MIPI DPHY out of reset and one of them needs to be set when IMX8MM_DISPBLK_PD_MIPI_CSI is brought out of reset or the MIPI_CSI hangs. Since MIPI_DSI is impacted, add the additional one for MIPI_DSI too. Fixes: 926e57c065df ("soc: imx: imx8m-blk-ctrl: add DISP blk-ctrl") Signed-off-by: Adam Ford Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Tested by: Tim Harvey Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c b/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c index 519b3651d1d9..c2f076b56e24 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #define BLK_SFT_RSTN 0x0 #define BLK_CLK_EN 0x4 +#define BLK_MIPI_RESET_DIV 0x8 /* Mini/Nano DISPLAY_BLK_CTRL only */ struct imx8m_blk_ctrl_domain; @@ -36,6 +37,15 @@ struct imx8m_blk_ctrl_domain_data { const char *gpc_name; u32 rst_mask; u32 clk_mask; + + /* + * i.MX8M Mini and Nano have a third DISPLAY_BLK_CTRL register + * which is used to control the reset for the MIPI Phy. + * Since it's only present in certain circumstances, + * an if-statement should be used before setting and clearing this + * register. + */ + u32 mipi_phy_rst_mask; }; #define DOMAIN_MAX_CLKS 3 @@ -78,6 +88,8 @@ static int imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) /* put devices into reset */ regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_SFT_RSTN, data->rst_mask); + if (data->mipi_phy_rst_mask) + regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_MIPI_RESET_DIV, data->mipi_phy_rst_mask); /* enable upstream and blk-ctrl clocks to allow reset to propagate */ ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(data->num_clks, domain->clks); @@ -99,6 +111,8 @@ static int imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) /* release reset */ regmap_set_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_SFT_RSTN, data->rst_mask); + if (data->mipi_phy_rst_mask) + regmap_set_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_MIPI_RESET_DIV, data->mipi_phy_rst_mask); /* disable upstream clocks */ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(data->num_clks, domain->clks); @@ -120,6 +134,9 @@ static int imx8m_blk_ctrl_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) struct imx8m_blk_ctrl *bc = domain->bc; /* put devices into reset and disable clocks */ + if (data->mipi_phy_rst_mask) + regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_MIPI_RESET_DIV, data->mipi_phy_rst_mask); + regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_SFT_RSTN, data->rst_mask); regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_CLK_EN, data->clk_mask); @@ -480,6 +497,7 @@ static const struct imx8m_blk_ctrl_domain_data imx8mm_disp_blk_ctl_domain_data[] .gpc_name = "mipi-dsi", .rst_mask = BIT(5), .clk_mask = BIT(8) | BIT(9), + .mipi_phy_rst_mask = BIT(17), }, [IMX8MM_DISPBLK_PD_MIPI_CSI] = { .name = "dispblk-mipi-csi", @@ -488,6 +506,7 @@ static const struct imx8m_blk_ctrl_domain_data imx8mm_disp_blk_ctl_domain_data[] .gpc_name = "mipi-csi", .rst_mask = BIT(3) | BIT(4), .clk_mask = BIT(10) | BIT(11), + .mipi_phy_rst_mask = BIT(16), }, }; From 4ebd29f91629e69da7d57390cdc953772eee03ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephan Gerhold Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:38:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] soc: imx: Register SoC device only on i.MX boards At the moment, using the ARM32 multi_v7_defconfig always results in two SoCs being exposed in sysfs. This is wrong, as far as I'm aware the Qualcomm DragonBoard 410c does not actually make use of a i.MX SoC. :) qcom-db410c:/sys/devices/soc0$ grep . * family:Freescale i.MX machine:Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC revision:0.0 serial_number:0000000000000000 soc_id:Unknown qcom-db410c:/sys/devices/soc1$ grep . * family:Snapdragon machine:APQ8016 ... This happens because imx_soc_device_init() registers the soc device unconditionally, even when running on devices that do not make use of i.MX. Arnd already reported this more than a year ago and even suggested a fix similar to this commit, but for some reason it was never submitted. Fix it by checking if the "__mxc_cpu_type" variable was actually initialized by earlier platform code. On devices without i.MX it will simply stay 0. Cc: Peng Fan Fixes: d2199b34871b ("ARM: imx: use device_initcall for imx_soc_device_init") Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAK8P3a0hxO1TmK6oOMQ70AHSWJnP_CAq57YMOutrxkSYNjFeuw@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam Reviewed-by: Peng Fan Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo --- drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c index ac6d856ba228..77bc12039c3d 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ static int __init imx_soc_device_init(void) int ret; int i; + /* Return early if this is running on devices with different SoCs */ + if (!__mxc_cpu_type) + return 0; + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,ls1021a")) return 0;