[NETFILTER]: xt_hashlimit: speedup hash_dst()
1) Using jhash2() instead of jhash() is a litle bit faster if applicable. 2) Thanks to jhash, hash value uses full 32 bits. Instead of returning hash % size (implying a divide) we return the high 32 bits of the (hash * size) that will give results between [0 and size-1] and same hash distribution. On most cpus, a multiply is less expensive than a divide, by an order of magnitude. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22c2d8bca2
commit
e2f82ac3fc
@ -105,7 +105,16 @@ static inline bool dst_cmp(const struct dsthash_ent *ent,
|
||||
static u_int32_t
|
||||
hash_dst(const struct xt_hashlimit_htable *ht, const struct dsthash_dst *dst)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return jhash(dst, sizeof(*dst), ht->rnd) % ht->cfg.size;
|
||||
u_int32_t hash = jhash2((const u32 *)dst,
|
||||
sizeof(*dst)/sizeof(u32),
|
||||
ht->rnd);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Instead of returning hash % ht->cfg.size (implying a divide)
|
||||
* we return the high 32 bits of the (hash * ht->cfg.size) that will
|
||||
* give results between [0 and cfg.size-1] and same hash distribution,
|
||||
* but using a multiply, less expensive than a divide
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return ((u64)hash * ht->cfg.size) >> 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct dsthash_ent *
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user