forked from Minki/linux
drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change
If we already have a timestamp for the current vblank counter, don't update it with a new timestmap. Small errors can creep in between two timestamp queries for the same vblank count, which could be confusing to userspace when it queries the timestamp for the same vblank sequence number twice. This problem gets exposed when the vblank disable timer is not used (or is set to expire quickly) and thus we can get multiple vblank disable<->enable transition during the same frame which would all attempt to update the timestamp with the latest estimate. Testcase: igt/kms_flip/flip-vs-expired-vblank Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com> v2:Mario: Trivial rebase on top of current drm-next (13-Sep-2014) Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d743ecf360
commit
da8f43962b
@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG("updating vblank count on crtc %d, missed %d\n",
|
||||
crtc, diff);
|
||||
|
||||
if (diff == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reinitialize corresponding vblank timestamp if high-precision query
|
||||
* available. Skip this step if query unsupported or failed. Will
|
||||
* reinitialize delayed at next vblank interrupt in that case.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user