From da41119af78864d27ccbf505949df788d5e8aaf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:02:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] ARM: Don't force SIGFPE We were forcing SIGFPE on to a user program for no good reason. Use send_sig_info() instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> --- arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c index 3aeedd2afc70..22f3da4e0829 100644 --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void vfp_raise_sigfpe(unsigned int sicode, struct pt_regs *regs) current->thread.error_code = 0; current->thread.trap_no = 6; - force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, current); + send_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, current); } static void vfp_panic(char *reason)