forked from Minki/linux
scsi: libfc: Don't have fc_exch_find log errors on a new exchange
With the error message I added in "libfc: sanity check cpu number extracted from xid" I didn't account for the fact that fc_exch_find is called with FC_XID_UNKNOWN at the start of a new exchange if we are the responder. It doesn't come up with the initiator much, but that's basically every exchange for a target. By checking the xid for FC_XID_UNKNOWN first, we not only prevent the erroneous error message, but skip the unnecessary lookup attempt as well. [mkp: applied by hand due to conflict with Hannes' libfc patch series] Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f0c06de80
commit
d5c3eb26d9
@ -939,6 +939,9 @@ static struct fc_exch *fc_exch_find(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, u16 xid)
|
||||
struct fc_exch *ep = NULL;
|
||||
u16 cpu = xid & fc_cpu_mask;
|
||||
|
||||
if (xid == FC_XID_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_possible(cpu)) {
|
||||
pr_err("host%u: lport %6.6x: xid %d invalid CPU %d\n:",
|
||||
lport->host->host_no, lport->port_id, xid, cpu);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user