x86: clean up comments wrt. rd{msr|tsc|pmc}
The rdmsr instruction(et al) for i386 and x86-64 are semantically same. The only difference is how gcc interpret constraint "A" for these targets. Signed-off-by: Jike Song <albcamus@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2011a06728
commit
d4f1b10365
@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ static inline unsigned long long native_read_tscp(unsigned int *aux)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* i386 calling convention returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, while
|
* both i386 and x86_64 returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, but gcc's "A"
|
||||||
* x86_64 returns at rax. Also, the "A" constraint does not really
|
* constraint has different meanings. For i386, "A" means exactly
|
||||||
* mean rdx:rax in x86_64, so we need specialized behaviour for each
|
* edx:eax, while for x86_64 it doesn't mean rdx:rax or edx:eax. Instead,
|
||||||
* architecture
|
* it means rax *or* rdx.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
|
||||||
#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) unsigned low, high
|
#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) unsigned low, high
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user