forked from Minki/linux
staging: unisys: visorbus: remove invalid comment, we are one driver.
Removed a comment that was describing the relationship between the visorchipset driver and the visorbus driver. Since they are now one driver the comment no longer makes sense. Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kershner@unisys.com> Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.sell@unisys.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b5577d79e2
commit
d337822efb
@ -1227,14 +1227,6 @@ initiate_chipset_device_pause_resume(struct visor_device *dev, bool is_pause)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note that even though both drv->pause() and drv->resume
|
||||
* specify a callback function, it is NOT necessary for us to
|
||||
* increment our local module usage count. Reason is, there
|
||||
* is already a linkage dependency between child function
|
||||
* drivers and visorbus, so it is already IMPOSSIBLE to unload
|
||||
* visorbus while child function drivers are still running.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_pause) {
|
||||
if (!drv->pause) {
|
||||
(*notify_func)(dev, -EINVAL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user