From cb3c19c93d656caa6fe63d6277aabd7e570f1d03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:16:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked The distinction is that assert_spin_locked() checks if the lock is held *by*anyone* whereas lockdep_assert_held() asserts the current context holds the lock. Also, the check goes away if you build without lockdep. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ympr/+PX4XgT/UKU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Tested-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-6-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- kernel/signal.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 72d96614effc..3fd2ce133387 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info, static void ptrace_trap_notify(struct task_struct *t) { WARN_ON_ONCE(!(t->ptrace & PT_SEIZED)); - assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock); + lockdep_assert_held(&t->sighand->siglock); task_set_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY); ptrace_signal_wake_up(t, t->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING); @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static int __send_signal_locked(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info, int override_rlimit; int ret = 0, result; - assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock); + lockdep_assert_held(&t->sighand->siglock); result = TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED; if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, force))