forked from Minki/linux
Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt update/rewrite
This is almost a rewrite of the driver-model/platform.txt documentation; the previous text was obsolete (for several years), evidently it never got updated to match the change from being a PC "legacy_bus" to the more widely used core bus for most embedded systems. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c67334fbdf
commit
c957b32406
@ -1,99 +1,131 @@
|
||||
Platform Devices and Drivers
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
See <linux/platform_device.h> for the driver model interface to the
|
||||
platform bus: platform_device, and platform_driver. This pseudo-bus
|
||||
is used to connect devices on busses with minimal infrastructure,
|
||||
like those used to integrate peripherals on many system-on-chip
|
||||
processors, or some "legacy" PC interconnects; as opposed to large
|
||||
formally specified ones like PCI or USB.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Platform devices
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Platform devices are devices that typically appear as autonomous
|
||||
entities in the system. This includes legacy port-based devices and
|
||||
host bridges to peripheral buses.
|
||||
host bridges to peripheral buses, and most controllers integrated
|
||||
into system-on-chip platforms. What they usually have in common
|
||||
is direct addressing from a CPU bus. Rarely, a platform_device will
|
||||
be connected through a segment of some other kind of bus; but its
|
||||
registers will still be directly addressible.
|
||||
|
||||
Platform devices are given a name, used in driver binding, and a
|
||||
list of resources such as addresses and IRQs.
|
||||
|
||||
struct platform_device {
|
||||
const char *name;
|
||||
u32 id;
|
||||
struct device dev;
|
||||
u32 num_resources;
|
||||
struct resource *resource;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Platform drivers
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Drivers for platform devices are typically very simple and
|
||||
unstructured. Either the device was present at a particular I/O port
|
||||
and the driver was loaded, or it was not. There was no possibility
|
||||
of hotplugging or alternative discovery besides probing at a specific
|
||||
I/O address and expecting a specific response.
|
||||
Platform drivers follow the standard driver model convention, where
|
||||
discovery/enumeration is handled outside the drivers, and drivers
|
||||
provide probe() and remove() methods. They support power management
|
||||
and shutdown notifications using the standard conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
struct platform_driver {
|
||||
int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
|
||||
int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
|
||||
void (*shutdown)(struct platform_device *);
|
||||
int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, pm_message_t state);
|
||||
int (*suspend_late)(struct platform_device *, pm_message_t state);
|
||||
int (*resume_early)(struct platform_device *);
|
||||
int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
|
||||
struct device_driver driver;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Note that probe() should general verify that the specified device hardware
|
||||
actually exists; sometimes platform setup code can't be sure. The probing
|
||||
can use device resources, including clocks, and device platform_data.
|
||||
|
||||
Platform drivers register themselves the normal way:
|
||||
|
||||
int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv);
|
||||
|
||||
Or, in common situations where the device is known not to be hot-pluggable,
|
||||
the probe() routine can live in an init section to reduce the driver's
|
||||
runtime memory footprint:
|
||||
|
||||
int platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv,
|
||||
int (*probe)(struct platform_device *))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Other Architectures, Modern Firmware, and new Platforms
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
These devices are not always at the legacy I/O ports. This is true on
|
||||
other architectures and on some modern architectures. In most cases,
|
||||
the drivers are modified to discover the devices at other well-known
|
||||
ports for the given platform. However, the firmware in these systems
|
||||
does usually know where exactly these devices reside, and in some
|
||||
cases, it's the only way of discovering them.
|
||||
Device Enumeration
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
As a rule, platform specific (and often board-specific) setup code wil
|
||||
register platform devices:
|
||||
|
||||
int platform_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
|
||||
|
||||
int platform_add_devices(struct platform_device **pdevs, int ndev);
|
||||
|
||||
The general rule is to register only those devices that actually exist,
|
||||
but in some cases extra devices might be registered. For example, a kernel
|
||||
might be configured to work with an external network adapter that might not
|
||||
be populated on all boards, or likewise to work with an integrated controller
|
||||
that some boards might not hook up to any peripherals.
|
||||
|
||||
In some cases, boot firmware will export tables describing the devices
|
||||
that are populated on a given board. Without such tables, often the
|
||||
only way for system setup code to set up the correct devices is to build
|
||||
a kernel for a specific target board. Such board-specific kernels are
|
||||
common with embedded and custom systems development.
|
||||
|
||||
In many cases, the memory and IRQ resources associated with the platform
|
||||
device are not enough to let the device's driver work. Board setup code
|
||||
will often provide additional information using the device's platform_data
|
||||
field to hold additional information.
|
||||
|
||||
Embedded systems frequently need one or more clocks for platform devices,
|
||||
which are normally kept off until they're actively needed (to save power).
|
||||
System setup also associates those clocks with the device, so that that
|
||||
calls to clk_get(&pdev->dev, clock_name) return them as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Platform Bus
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
A platform bus has been created to deal with these issues. First and
|
||||
foremost, it groups all the legacy devices under a common bus, and
|
||||
gives them a common parent if they don't already have one.
|
||||
Device Naming and Driver Binding
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
The platform_device.dev.bus_id is the canonical name for the devices.
|
||||
It's built from two components:
|
||||
|
||||
But, besides the organizational benefits, the platform bus can also
|
||||
accommodate firmware-based enumeration.
|
||||
* platform_device.name ... which is also used to for driver matching.
|
||||
|
||||
* platform_device.id ... the device instance number, or else "-1"
|
||||
to indicate there's only one.
|
||||
|
||||
Device Discovery
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
The platform bus has no concept of probing for devices. Devices
|
||||
discovery is left up to either the legacy drivers or the
|
||||
firmware. These entities are expected to notify the platform of
|
||||
devices that it discovers via the bus's add() callback:
|
||||
These are catenated, so name/id "serial"/0 indicates bus_id "serial.0", and
|
||||
"serial/3" indicates bus_id "serial.3"; both would use the platform_driver
|
||||
named "serial". While "my_rtc"/-1 would be bus_id "my_rtc" (no instance id)
|
||||
and use the platform_driver called "my_rtc".
|
||||
|
||||
platform_bus.add(parent,bus_id).
|
||||
Driver binding is performed automatically by the driver core, invoking
|
||||
driver probe() after finding a match between device and driver. If the
|
||||
probe() succeeds, the driver and device are bound as usual. There are
|
||||
three different ways to find such a match:
|
||||
|
||||
- Whenever a device is registered, the drivers for that bus are
|
||||
checked for matches. Platform devices should be registered very
|
||||
early during system boot.
|
||||
|
||||
Bus IDs
|
||||
~~~~~~~
|
||||
Bus IDs are the canonical names for the devices. There is no globally
|
||||
standard addressing mechanism for legacy devices. In the IA-32 world,
|
||||
we have Pnp IDs to use, as well as the legacy I/O ports. However,
|
||||
neither tell what the device really is or have any meaning on other
|
||||
platforms.
|
||||
- When a driver is registered using platform_driver_register(), all
|
||||
unbound devices on that bus are checked for matches. Drivers
|
||||
usually register later during booting, or by module loading.
|
||||
|
||||
Since both PnP IDs and the legacy I/O ports (and other standard I/O
|
||||
ports for specific devices) have a 1:1 mapping, we map the
|
||||
platform-specific name or identifier to a generic name (at least
|
||||
within the scope of the kernel).
|
||||
|
||||
For example, a serial driver might find a device at I/O 0x3f8. The
|
||||
ACPI firmware might also discover a device with PnP ID (_HID)
|
||||
PNP0501. Both correspond to the same device and should be mapped to the
|
||||
canonical name 'serial'.
|
||||
|
||||
The bus_id field should be a concatenation of the canonical name and
|
||||
the instance of that type of device. For example, the device at I/O
|
||||
port 0x3f8 should have a bus_id of "serial0". This places the
|
||||
responsibility of enumerating devices of a particular type up to the
|
||||
discovery mechanism. But, they are the entity that should know best
|
||||
(as opposed to the platform bus driver).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Drivers
|
||||
~~~~~~~
|
||||
Drivers for platform devices should have a name that is the same as
|
||||
the canonical name of the devices they support. This allows the
|
||||
platform bus driver to do simple matching with the basic data
|
||||
structures to determine if a driver supports a certain device.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, a legacy serial driver should have a name of 'serial' and
|
||||
register itself with the platform bus.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Driver Binding
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Legacy drivers assume they are bound to the device once they start up
|
||||
and probe an I/O port. Divorcing them from this will be a difficult
|
||||
process. However, that shouldn't prevent us from implementing
|
||||
firmware-based enumeration.
|
||||
|
||||
The firmware should notify the platform bus about devices before the
|
||||
legacy drivers have had a chance to load. Once the drivers are loaded,
|
||||
they driver model core will attempt to bind the driver to any
|
||||
previously-discovered devices. Once that has happened, it will be free
|
||||
to discover any other devices it pleases.
|
||||
- Registering a driver using platform_driver_probe() works just like
|
||||
using platform_driver_register(), except that the the driver won't
|
||||
be probed later if another device registers. (Which is OK, since
|
||||
this interface is only for use with non-hotpluggable devices.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user