futex: Fix pi_state->owner serialization
There was a reported suspicion about a race between exit_pi_state_list() and put_pi_state(). The same report mentioned the comment with put_pi_state() said it should be called with hb->lock held, and it no longer is in all places. As it turns out, the pi_state->owner serialization is indeed broken. As per the new rules:734009e96d("futex: Change locking rules") pi_state->owner should be serialized by pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock. For the sites setting pi_state->owner we already hold wait_lock (where required) but exit_pi_state_list() and put_pi_state() were not and raced on clearing it. Fixes:734009e96d("futex: Change locking rules") Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170922154806.jd3ffltfk24m4o4y@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									e19b205be4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						c74aef2d06
					
				| @ -821,8 +821,6 @@ static void get_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) | |||||||
| /*
 | /*
 | ||||||
|  * Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it |  * Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it | ||||||
|  * when the last reference is gone. |  * when the last reference is gone. | ||||||
|  * |  | ||||||
|  * Must be called with the hb lock held. |  | ||||||
|  */ |  */ | ||||||
| static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) | static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) | ||||||
| { | { | ||||||
| @ -837,16 +835,22 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) | |||||||
| 	 * and has cleaned up the pi_state already | 	 * and has cleaned up the pi_state already | ||||||
| 	 */ | 	 */ | ||||||
| 	if (pi_state->owner) { | 	if (pi_state->owner) { | ||||||
| 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock); | 		struct task_struct *owner; | ||||||
| 		list_del_init(&pi_state->list); |  | ||||||
| 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock); |  | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 		rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, pi_state->owner); | 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
|  | 		owner = pi_state->owner; | ||||||
|  | 		if (owner) { | ||||||
|  | 			raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock); | ||||||
|  | 			list_del_init(&pi_state->list); | ||||||
|  | 			raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock); | ||||||
|  | 		} | ||||||
|  | 		rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, owner); | ||||||
|  | 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
| 	} | 	} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	if (current->pi_state_cache) | 	if (current->pi_state_cache) { | ||||||
| 		kfree(pi_state); | 		kfree(pi_state); | ||||||
| 	else { | 	} else { | ||||||
| 		/*
 | 		/*
 | ||||||
| 		 * pi_state->list is already empty. | 		 * pi_state->list is already empty. | ||||||
| 		 * clear pi_state->owner. | 		 * clear pi_state->owner. | ||||||
| @ -907,13 +911,14 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) | |||||||
| 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock); | 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 		spin_lock(&hb->lock); | 		spin_lock(&hb->lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
| 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock); | 		raw_spin_lock(&curr->pi_lock); | ||||||
| 		/*
 | 		/*
 | ||||||
| 		 * We dropped the pi-lock, so re-check whether this | 		 * We dropped the pi-lock, so re-check whether this | ||||||
| 		 * task still owns the PI-state: | 		 * task still owns the PI-state: | ||||||
| 		 */ | 		 */ | ||||||
| 		if (head->next != next) { | 		if (head->next != next) { | ||||||
|  | 			raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
| 			spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | 			spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | ||||||
| 			continue; | 			continue; | ||||||
| 		} | 		} | ||||||
| @ -922,9 +927,10 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) | |||||||
| 		WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list)); | 		WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list)); | ||||||
| 		list_del_init(&pi_state->list); | 		list_del_init(&pi_state->list); | ||||||
| 		pi_state->owner = NULL; | 		pi_state->owner = NULL; | ||||||
| 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock); | 		raw_spin_unlock(&curr->pi_lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 		get_pi_state(pi_state); | 		get_pi_state(pi_state); | ||||||
|  | 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
| 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 		rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex); | 		rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex); | ||||||
| @ -1208,6 +1214,10 @@ static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 uval, union futex_key *key, | |||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); | 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list)); | ||||||
| 	list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list); | 	list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list); | ||||||
|  | 	/*
 | ||||||
|  | 	 * Assignment without holding pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock is safe | ||||||
|  | 	 * because there is no concurrency as the object is not published yet. | ||||||
|  | 	 */ | ||||||
| 	pi_state->owner = p; | 	pi_state->owner = p; | ||||||
| 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); | 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| @ -2878,6 +2888,7 @@ retry: | |||||||
| 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); | ||||||
| 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | 		/* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */ | ||||||
| 		ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state); | 		ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| 		put_pi_state(pi_state); | 		put_pi_state(pi_state); | ||||||
|  | |||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user