leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ipc/mqueue.c: update/document memory barriers

Browse Source 
Update and document memory barriers for mqueue.c:

- ewp->state is read without any locks, thus READ_ONCE is required.

- add smp_aquire__after_ctrl_dep() after the READ_ONCE, we need
  acquire semantics if the value is STATE_READY.

- use wake_q_add_safe()

- document why __set_current_state() may be used:
  Reading task->state cannot happen before the wake_q_add() call,
  which happens while holding info->lock. Thus the spin_unlock()
  is the RELEASE, and the spin_lock() is the ACQUIRE.

For completeness: there is also a 3 CPU scenario, if the to be woken
up task is already on another wake_q.
Then:
- CPU1: spin_unlock() of the task that goes to sleep is the RELEASE
- CPU2: the spin_lock() of the waker is the ACQUIRE
- CPU2: smp_mb__before_atomic inside wake_q_add() is the RELEASE
- CPU3: smp_mb__after_spinlock() inside try_to_wake_up() is the ACQUIRE

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191020123305.14715-4-manfred@colorfullife.com
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: <1vier1@web.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Manfred Spraul 2020-02-03 17:34:36 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent ed29f17151
commit c5b2cbdbda
1 changed files with 78 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

92
ipc/mqueue.c
View File

@ -63,6 +63,66 @@ struct posix_msg_tree_node {
int priority;
};
/*
* Locking:
*
* Accesses to a message queue are synchronized by acquiring info->lock.
*
* There are two notable exceptions:
* - The actual wakeup of a sleeping task is performed using the wake_q
* framework. info->lock is already released when wake_up_q is called.
* - The exit codepaths after sleeping check ext_wait_queue->state without
* any locks. If it is STATE_READY, then the syscall is completed without
* acquiring info->lock.
*
* MQ_BARRIER:
* To achieve proper release/acquire memory barrier pairing, the state is set to
* STATE_READY with smp_store_release(), and it is read with READ_ONCE followed
* by smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(). In addition, wake_q_add_safe() is used.
*
* This prevents the following races:
*
* 1) With the simple wake_q_add(), the task could be gone already before
* the increase of the reference happens
* Thread A
* Thread B
* WRITE_ONCE(wait.state, STATE_NONE);
* schedule_hrtimeout()
* wake_q_add(A)
* if (cmpxchg()) // success
* ->state = STATE_READY (reordered)
* <timeout returns>
* if (wait.state == STATE_READY) return;
* sysret to user space
* sys_exit()
* get_task_struct() // UaF
*
* Solution: Use wake_q_add_safe() and perform the get_task_struct() before
* the smp_store_release() that does ->state = STATE_READY.
*
* 2) Without proper _release/_acquire barriers, the woken up task
* could read stale data
*
* Thread A
* Thread B
* do_mq_timedreceive
* WRITE_ONCE(wait.state, STATE_NONE);
* schedule_hrtimeout()
* state = STATE_READY;
* <timeout returns>
* if (wait.state == STATE_READY) return;
* msg_ptr = wait.msg; // Access to stale data!
* receiver->msg = message; (reordered)
*
* Solution: use _release and _acquire barriers.
*
* 3) There is intentionally no barrier when setting current->state
* to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE: spin_unlock(&info->lock) provides the
* release memory barrier, and the wakeup is triggered when holding
* info->lock, i.e. spin_lock(&info->lock) provided a pairing
* acquire memory barrier.
*/
struct ext_wait_queue { /* queue of sleeping tasks */
struct task_struct *task;
struct list_head list;
@ -646,18 +706,23 @@ static int wq_sleep(struct mqueue_inode_info *info, int sr,
wq_add(info, sr, ewp);
for (;;) {
/* memory barrier not required, we hold info->lock */
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_unlock(&info->lock);
time = schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock(timeout, 0,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS, CLOCK_REALTIME);
if (ewp->state == STATE_READY) {
if (READ_ONCE(ewp->state) == STATE_READY) {
/* see MQ_BARRIER for purpose/pairing */
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
retval = 0;
goto out;
}
spin_lock(&info->lock);
if (ewp->state == STATE_READY) {
/* we hold info->lock, so no memory barrier required */
if (READ_ONCE(ewp->state) == STATE_READY) {
retval = 0;
goto out_unlock;
}
@ -923,16 +988,11 @@ static inline void __pipelined_op(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
struct ext_wait_queue *this)
{
list_del(&this->list);
wake_q_add(wake_q, this->task);
/*
* Rely on the implicit cmpxchg barrier from wake_q_add such
* that we can ensure that updating receiver->state is the last
* write operation: As once set, the receiver can continue,
* and if we don't have the reference count from the wake_q,
* yet, at that point we can later have a use-after-free
* condition and bogus wakeup.
*/
this->state = STATE_READY;
get_task_struct(this->task);
/* see MQ_BARRIER for purpose/pairing */
smp_store_release(&this->state, STATE_READY);
wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, this->task);
}
/* pipelined_send() - send a message directly to the task waiting in
@ -1049,7 +1109,9 @@ static int do_mq_timedsend(mqd_t mqdes, const char __user *u_msg_ptr,
} else {
wait.task = current;
wait.msg = (void *) msg_ptr;
wait.state = STATE_NONE;
/* memory barrier not required, we hold info->lock */
WRITE_ONCE(wait.state, STATE_NONE);
ret = wq_sleep(info, SEND, timeout, &wait);
/*
* wq_sleep must be called with info->lock held, and
@ -1152,7 +1214,9 @@ static int do_mq_timedreceive(mqd_t mqdes, char __user *u_msg_ptr,
ret = -EAGAIN;
} else {
wait.task = current;
wait.state = STATE_NONE;
/* memory barrier not required, we hold info->lock */
WRITE_ONCE(wait.state, STATE_NONE);
ret = wq_sleep(info, RECV, timeout, &wait);
msg_ptr = wait.msg;
}