net: sk_wmem_alloc has initial value of one, not zero
commit 2b85a34e91
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
changed initial sk_wmem_alloc value.
Some protocols check sk_wmem_alloc value to determine if a timer
must delay socket deallocation. We must take care of the sk_wmem_alloc
value being one instead of zero when no write allocations are pending.
Reported by Ingo Molnar, and full diagnostic from David Miller.
This patch introduces three helpers to get read/write allocations
and a followup patch will use these helpers to report correct
write allocations to user.
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
1d4ac5d5ef
commit
c564039fd8
@@ -1206,6 +1206,39 @@ static inline int skb_copy_to_page(struct sock *sk, char __user *from,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* sk_wmem_alloc_get - returns write allocations
|
||||
* @sk: socket
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns sk_wmem_alloc minus initial offset of one
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int sk_wmem_alloc_get(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) - 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* sk_rmem_alloc_get - returns read allocations
|
||||
* @sk: socket
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns sk_rmem_alloc
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int sk_rmem_alloc_get(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* sk_has_allocations - check if allocations are outstanding
|
||||
* @sk: socket
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns true if socket has write or read allocations
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int sk_has_allocations(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk) || sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Queue a received datagram if it will fit. Stream and sequenced
|
||||
* protocols can't normally use this as they need to fit buffers in
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user