forked from Minki/linux
drm/i915: Protect request peeking with RCU
Since the execlists_active() is no longer protected by the engine->active.lock, we need to protect the request pointer with RCU to prevent it being freed as we evaluate whether or not we need to preempt. Fixes:df40306902
("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104090158.2959-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit7d14863525
) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (cherry picked from commit8eb4704b12
) (cherry picked from commit 7e27238e149ce4f00d9cd801fe3aa0ea55e986a2) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d691aeca4
commit
c0fa92ec89
@ -177,9 +177,37 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
|
||||
return rq->sched.attr.priority | __NO_PREEMPTION;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
|
||||
static inline bool need_preempt(int prio, int active)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct i915_request *inflight = *engine->execlists.active;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Allow preemption of low -> normal -> high, but we do
|
||||
* not allow low priority tasks to preempt other low priority
|
||||
* tasks under the impression that latency for low priority
|
||||
* tasks does not matter (as much as background throughput),
|
||||
* so kiss.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return prio >= max(I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL, active);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
||||
const struct i915_request *rq,
|
||||
int prio)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct i915_request *inflight;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We only need to kick the tasklet once for the high priority
|
||||
* new context we add into the queue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
|
||||
inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
|
||||
if (!inflight)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
|
||||
@ -188,10 +216,15 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
|
||||
* tasklet, i.e. we have not change the priority queue
|
||||
* sufficiently to oust the running context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!inflight || !i915_scheduler_need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (inflight->hw_context == rq->hw_context)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
|
||||
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
|
||||
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
|
||||
@ -317,13 +350,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
|
||||
list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
|
||||
kick_submission(engine, prio);
|
||||
kick_submission(engine, node_to_request(node), prio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&engine->active.lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user