drm/i915: Enable eLLC caching of display buffers for SKL+
Since SKL the eLLC has been sitting on the far side of the system agent, meaning the display engine can utilize it. Let's enable that. I chose WB for the caching mode, because my numbers are indicating that WT might actually be WB and WC might actually be UC. I'm not 100% sure that is indeed the case but at least my simple rendercopy based benchmark didn't see any difference in performance. Also if I configure things to do LLCeLLC+WT I still get cache dirt on my screen, suggesting that is in fact operating in WB mode anyway. This is also the reason I had to fix the MOCS target cache to really say PTE rather than LLC+eLLC. Since SKL the eLLC has been sitting on the far side of the system agent, meaning the display engine can utilize it. Let's enable that. Eero's earlier benchmarks numbers: "* Results in GfxBench and Unigine (Valley/Heaven) tests were within daily variation on the tested SKL machines * SKL GT4e (128MB eLLC) / Wayland / Weston: +15-20% SynMark TexMem512 (512MB of textures) +4-6% SynMark TerrainFly*, CSCloth, ShMapVsm -5-10% SynMark TexMem128 (128MB of textures) * SKL GT3e (64MB eLLC) / Xorg / Unity: +4-8% GpuTest Triangle fullscreen (FullHD) -5-10% GpuTest Triangle windowed (1/2 screen) * SKL GT2 (no eLLC) / Xorg / Unity: * Some of the higher FPS SynMark pixel and vertex shader tests are few percent higher, more than daily variance => Do you see any reason why this machine would be impacted although it doesn't eLLC?" Caveats: - Still haven't tested with a prime setup - Still not entirely sure this a good idea, but I've been using it on my cfl anyway :) v2: Split the MOCS PTE change out Cc: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007120329.17076-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201015122138.30161-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
36b6b68169
commit
c0888e9e22
@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
|
||||
intel_uncore_write(uncore,
|
||||
GEN10_PAT_INDEX(2),
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE);
|
||||
intel_uncore_write(uncore,
|
||||
GEN10_PAT_INDEX(3),
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT_UC);
|
||||
@ -349,17 +349,23 @@ static void cnl_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void bdw_setup_private_ppat(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
|
||||
u64 pat;
|
||||
|
||||
pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC) | /* for normal objects, no eLLC */
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for something pointing to ptes? */
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for scanout with eLLC */
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(3, GEN8_PPAT_UC) | /* Uncached objects, mostly for scanout */
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(4, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0)) |
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(5, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(1)) |
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(6, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(2)) |
|
||||
GEN8_PPAT(7, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3));
|
||||
|
||||
/* for scanout with eLLC */
|
||||
if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 9)
|
||||
pat |= GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE);
|
||||
else
|
||||
pat |= GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_LO, lower_32_bits(pat));
|
||||
intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT_HI, upper_32_bits(pat));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1620,8 +1620,7 @@ extern const struct i915_rev_steppings kbl_revids[];
|
||||
#define HAS_SNOOP(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_snoop)
|
||||
#define HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->edram_size_mb)
|
||||
#define HAS_SECURE_BATCHES(dev_priv) (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 6)
|
||||
#define HAS_WT(dev_priv) ((IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || \
|
||||
IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) && HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv))
|
||||
#define HAS_WT(dev_priv) HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv)
|
||||
|
||||
#define HWS_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->hws_needs_physical)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user