forked from Minki/linux
rcu: Switch __rcu_process_callbacks() to rcu_accelerate_cbs()
The __rcu_process_callbacks() function currently checks to see if the current CPU needs a grace period and also if there is any other reason to kick off a new grace period. This is one of the fail-safe checks that has been rendered unnecessary by the changes that increase the accuracy of rcu_gp_cleanup()'s estimate as to whether another grace period is required. Because this particular fail-safe involved acquiring the root rcu_node structure's ->lock, which has seen excessive contention in real life, this fail-safe needs to go. However, one check must remain, namely the check for newly arrived RCU callbacks that have not yet been associated with a grace period. One might hope that the checks in __note_gp_changes(), which is invoked indirectly from rcu_check_quiescent_state(), would suffice, but this function won't be invoked at all if RCU is idle. It is therefore necessary to replace the fail-safe checks with a simpler check for newly arrived callbacks during an RCU idle period, which is exactly what this commit does. This change removes the final call to rcu_start_gp(), so this function is removed as well. Note that lockless use of cpu_needs_another_gp() is racy, but that these races are harmless in this case. If RCU really is idle, the values will not change, so the return value from cpu_needs_another_gp() will be correct. If RCU is not idle, the resulting redundant call to rcu_accelerate_cbs() will be harmless, and might even have the benefit of reducing grace-period latency a bit. This commit also moves interrupt disabling into the "if" statement to improve real-time response a bit. Reported-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6058d85a2
commit
bd7af8463b
@ -2334,34 +2334,6 @@ rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Similar to rcu_start_gp_advanced(), but also advance the calling CPU's
|
||||
* callbacks. Note that rcu_start_gp_advanced() cannot do this because it
|
||||
* is invoked indirectly from rcu_advance_cbs(), which would result in
|
||||
* endless recursion -- or would do so if it wasn't for the self-deadlock
|
||||
* that is encountered beforehand.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns true if the grace-period kthread needs to be awakened.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
bool ret = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there is no grace period in progress right now, any
|
||||
* callbacks we have up to this point will be satisfied by the
|
||||
* next grace period. Also, advancing the callbacks reduces the
|
||||
* probability of false positives from cpu_needs_another_gp()
|
||||
* resulting in pointless grace periods. So, advance callbacks
|
||||
* then start the grace period!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = rcu_advance_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp) || ret;
|
||||
ret = rcu_start_gp_advanced(rsp, rnp, rdp) || ret;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Report a full set of quiescent states to the specified rcu_state data
|
||||
* structure. Invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to awaken the grace-period
|
||||
@ -2889,22 +2861,27 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
bool needwake;
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->beenonline);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update RCU state based on any recent quiescent states. */
|
||||
rcu_check_quiescent_state(rsp, rdp);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Does this CPU require a not-yet-started grace period? */
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp)); /* irqs disabled. */
|
||||
needwake = rcu_start_gp(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rcu_get_root(rsp), flags);
|
||||
if (needwake)
|
||||
rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
/* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */
|
||||
if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp) &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) {
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
if (rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL)) {
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
rnp = rdp->mynode;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs disabled. */
|
||||
needwake = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
|
||||
if (needwake)
|
||||
rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user