leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

vfio: Simplify the life cycle of the group FD

Browse Source 
Once userspace opens a group FD it is prevented from opening another
instance of that same group FD until all the prior group FDs and users of
the container are done.

The first is done trivially by checking the group->opened during group FD
open.

However, things get a little weird if userspace creates a device FD and
then closes the group FD. The group FD still cannot be re-opened, but this
time it is because the group->container is still set and container_users
is elevated by the device FD.

Due to this mismatched lifecycle we have the
vfio_group_try_dissolve_container() which tries to auto-free a container
after the group FD is closed but the device FD remains open.

Instead have the device FD hold onto a reference to the single group
FD. This directly prevents vfio_group_fops_release() from being called
when any device FD exists and makes the lifecycle model more
understandable.

vfio_group_try_dissolve_container() is removed as the only place a
container is auto-deleted is during vfio_group_fops_release(). At this
point the container_users is either 1 or 0 since all device FDs must be
closed.

Change group->opened to group->opened_file which points to the single
struct file * that is open for the group. If the group->open_file is
NULL then group->container == NULL.

If all device FDs have closed then the group's notifier list must be
empty.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5-v2-d035a1842d81+1bf-vfio_group_locking_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Gunthorpe 2022-05-16 20:41:21 -03:00 committed by Alex Williamson
parent e0e29bdb59
commit b76c0eed74
1 changed files with 24 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

52
drivers/vfio/vfio.c
View File

@ -73,11 +73,11 @@ struct vfio_group {
struct mutex device_lock;
struct list_head vfio_next;
struct list_head container_next;
bool opened;
enum vfio_group_type type;
unsigned int dev_counter;
struct rw_semaphore group_rwsem;
struct kvm *kvm;
struct file *opened_file;
struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
};
@ -967,20 +967,6 @@ static int vfio_group_unset_container(struct vfio_group *group)
return 0;
}
/*
* When removing container users, anything that removes the last user
* implicitly removes the group from the container. That is, if the
* group file descriptor is closed, as well as any device file descriptors,
* the group is free.
*/
static void vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(struct vfio_group *group)
{
down_write(&group->group_rwsem);
if (0 == atomic_dec_if_positive(&group->container_users))
__vfio_group_unset_container(group);
up_write(&group->group_rwsem);
}
static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
{
struct fd f;
@ -1068,10 +1054,19 @@ static int vfio_device_assign_container(struct vfio_device *device)
if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
return -EPERM;
get_file(group->opened_file);
atomic_inc(&group->container_users);
return 0;
}
static void vfio_device_unassign_container(struct vfio_device *device)
{
down_write(&device->group->group_rwsem);
atomic_dec(&device->group->container_users);
fput(device->group->opened_file);
up_write(&device->group->group_rwsem);
}
static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
{
struct file *filep;
@ -1133,7 +1128,7 @@ err_undo_count:
mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
err_unassign_container:
vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(device->group);
vfio_device_unassign_container(device);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
@ -1264,18 +1259,12 @@ static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
/*
* Do we need multiple instances of the group open? Seems not.
* Is something still in use from a previous open?
*/
if (group->opened || group->container) {
if (group->opened_file) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto err_put;
}
group->opened = true;
/* Warn if previous user didn't cleanup and re-init to drop them */
if (WARN_ON(group->notifier.head))
BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
group->opened_file = filep;
filep->private_data = group;
up_write(&group->group_rwsem);
@ -1293,10 +1282,17 @@ static int vfio_group_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
filep->private_data = NULL;
vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(group);
down_write(&group->group_rwsem);
group->opened = false;
/*
* Device FDs hold a group file reference, therefore the group release
* is only called when there are no open devices.
*/
WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);
if (group->container) {
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&group->container_users) != 1);
__vfio_group_unset_container(group);
}
group->opened_file = NULL;
up_write(&group->group_rwsem);
vfio_group_put(group);
@ -1328,7 +1324,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(device->group);
vfio_device_unassign_container(device);
vfio_device_put(device);