forked from Minki/linux
Revert "btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub"
This reverts commit786672e9e1
. [BUG] Since commit786672e9e1
("btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub"), btrfs scrub no longer reports errors if the corruption is not in the first sector of a STRIPE_LEN. The following script can expose the problem: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 8k" $mnt/foobar umount $mnt # 13631488 is the logical bytenr of above 8K extent btrfs-map-logical -l 13631488 -b 4096 $dev mirror 1 logical 13631488 physical 13631488 device /dev/test/scratch1 # Corrupt the 2nd sector of that extent xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x00 13635584 4k" $dev mount $dev $mnt btrfs scrub start -B $mnt scrub done for 54e63f9f-0c30-4c84-a33b-5c56014629b7 Scrub started: Mon Nov 7 07:18:27 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 536.00MiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: no errors found <<< [CAUSE] That offending commit enlarges the data extent scrub size from sector size to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, to avoid extra scrub_block to be allocated. But unfortunately the data extent scrub is still heavily relying on the fact that there is only one scrub_sector per scrub_block. Thus it will only check the first sector, and ignoring the remaining sectors. Furthermore the error reporting is not able to handle multiple sectors either. [FIX] For now just revert the offending commit. The consequence is just extra memory usage during scrub. We will need a proper change to make the remaining data scrub path to handle multiple sectors before we enlarging the data scrub size. Reported-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8bb808c6ad
commit
b75b51f886
@ -2672,17 +2672,11 @@ static int scrub_extent(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, struct map_lookup *map,
|
||||
u8 csum[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
|
||||
u32 blocksize;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Block size determines how many scrub_block will be allocated. Here
|
||||
* we use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN (64KiB) as default limit, so we won't
|
||||
* allocate too many scrub_block, while still won't cause too large
|
||||
* bios for large extents.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_DATA) {
|
||||
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
|
||||
blocksize = map->stripe_len;
|
||||
else
|
||||
blocksize = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
|
||||
blocksize = sctx->fs_info->sectorsize;
|
||||
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
|
||||
sctx->stat.data_extents_scrubbed++;
|
||||
sctx->stat.data_bytes_scrubbed += len;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user