clk: sunxi: Fix operator precedence in sunxi_divs_clk_setup

r375326 in Clang exposes an issue with operator precedence in
sunxi_div_clk_setup:

drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: warning: operator '?:' has lower
precedence than '|'; '|' will be evaluated first
[-Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses]
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '|' expression to silence this warning
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                                       ^
                                                                      )
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                                       ^
                                                 (
1 warning generated.

It appears that the intention was for ?: to be evaluated first so that
CLK_IS_CRITICAL could be added to clkflags if the critical boolean was
set; right now, | is being evaluated first. Add parentheses around the
?: block to have it be evaluated first.

Fixes: 9919d44ff2 ("clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical clks")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/745
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Chancellor 2019-10-22 09:50:54 -07:00 committed by Maxime Ripard
parent 54ecb8f702
commit afdc74ed2d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: E3EF0D6F671851C5

View File

@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static struct clk ** __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
rate_hw, rate_ops,
gate_hw, &clk_gate_ops,
clkflags |
data->div[i].critical ?
CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0);
(data->div[i].critical ?
CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0));
WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
}