forked from Minki/linux
x86: simplify stackprotector self-check
Clean up the code by removing no longer needed code; make sure the pda is updated and kept in sync Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa92db1427
commit
af9ff7868f
@ -131,4 +131,5 @@ do { \
|
||||
|
||||
#define PDA_STACKOFFSET (5*8)
|
||||
|
||||
#define refresh_stack_canary() write_pda(stack_canary, current->stack_canary)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -328,37 +328,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(warn_on_slowpath);
|
||||
#ifndef GCC_HAS_SP
|
||||
#warning You have selected the CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR option, but the gcc used does not support this.
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long __stack_check_testing;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Self test function for the stack-protector feature.
|
||||
* This test requires that the local variable absolutely has
|
||||
* a stack slot, hence the barrier()s.
|
||||
* a stack slot.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline void __stack_chk_test_func(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long foo;
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we need to make sure we're not about to clobber the return address,
|
||||
* while real exploits do this, it's unhealthy on a running system.
|
||||
* Besides, if we would, the test is already failed anyway so
|
||||
* time to pull the emergency brake on it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) ==
|
||||
*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
|
||||
/* We also don't want to clobber the frame pointer */
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) ==
|
||||
*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+2)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (current->stack_canary != *(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1))
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector canary found\n");
|
||||
unsigned long dummy_buffer[64]; /* force gcc to use the canary */
|
||||
|
||||
current->stack_canary = ~current->stack_canary;
|
||||
refresh_stack_canary();
|
||||
dummy_buffer[3] = 1; /* fool gcc into keeping the variable */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __stack_chk_test(void)
|
||||
@ -371,6 +355,7 @@ static int __stack_chk_test(void)
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
};
|
||||
current->stack_canary = ~current->stack_canary;
|
||||
refresh_stack_canary();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user