forked from Minki/linux
drm/i915: Implement read-only support in whitelist selftest
Newer hardware supports extra feature in the whitelist registers. This patch updates the selftest to test that entries marked as read only are actually read only. v2: Removed all use of 'rsvd' for read-only registers to avoid ambiguous code or error messages. Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712070745.35239-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e2b7f497c
commit
aee20aaed8
@ -485,12 +485,12 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
|
||||
u32 srm, lrm, rsvd;
|
||||
u32 expect;
|
||||
int idx;
|
||||
bool ro_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
if (wo_register(engine, reg))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ro_register(reg))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
ro_reg = ro_register(reg);
|
||||
|
||||
srm = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM;
|
||||
lrm = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM;
|
||||
@ -591,24 +591,35 @@ err_request:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
GEM_BUG_ON(values[ARRAY_SIZE(values) - 1] != 0xffffffff);
|
||||
rsvd = results[ARRAY_SIZE(values)]; /* detect write masking */
|
||||
if (!rsvd) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
|
||||
engine->name, reg);
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unpin;
|
||||
if (!ro_reg) {
|
||||
/* detect write masking */
|
||||
rsvd = results[ARRAY_SIZE(values)];
|
||||
if (!rsvd) {
|
||||
pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
|
||||
engine->name, reg);
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unpin;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
idx = 1;
|
||||
for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, values[v], rsvd);
|
||||
if (ro_reg)
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
else
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, values[v], rsvd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (results[idx] != expect)
|
||||
err++;
|
||||
idx++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, ~values[v], rsvd);
|
||||
if (ro_reg)
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
else
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, ~values[v], rsvd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (results[idx] != expect)
|
||||
err++;
|
||||
idx++;
|
||||
@ -617,15 +628,22 @@ err_request:
|
||||
pr_err("%s: %d mismatch between values written to whitelisted register [%x], and values read back!\n",
|
||||
engine->name, err, reg);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("%s: Whitelisted register: %x, original value %08x, rsvd %08x\n",
|
||||
engine->name, reg, results[0], rsvd);
|
||||
if (ro_reg)
|
||||
pr_info("%s: Whitelisted read-only register: %x, original value %08x\n",
|
||||
engine->name, reg, results[0]);
|
||||
else
|
||||
pr_info("%s: Whitelisted register: %x, original value %08x, rsvd %08x\n",
|
||||
engine->name, reg, results[0], rsvd);
|
||||
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
idx = 1;
|
||||
for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
|
||||
u32 w = values[v];
|
||||
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
|
||||
if (ro_reg)
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
else
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
|
||||
pr_info("Wrote %08x, read %08x, expect %08x\n",
|
||||
w, results[idx], expect);
|
||||
idx++;
|
||||
@ -633,7 +651,10 @@ err_request:
|
||||
for (v = 0; v < ARRAY_SIZE(values); v++) {
|
||||
u32 w = ~values[v];
|
||||
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
|
||||
if (ro_reg)
|
||||
expect = results[0];
|
||||
else
|
||||
expect = reg_write(expect, w, rsvd);
|
||||
pr_info("Wrote %08x, read %08x, expect %08x\n",
|
||||
w, results[idx], expect);
|
||||
idx++;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user