mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll_timout
The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the tight-loop here. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									dd50a1c4e5
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						aba3a882a1
					
				| @ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_hw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi) | ||||
| 	u32 val; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->base + HSFSTS_CTL, val, | ||||
| 				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0, | ||||
| 				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40, | ||||
| 				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_sw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi) | ||||
| 	u32 val; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL, val, | ||||
| 				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0, | ||||
| 				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40, | ||||
| 				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user