locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement
Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu() is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-12-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2904d9fa45
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						a66b6922dc
					
				| @ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force) | ||||
| 	class->key = key; | ||||
| 	class->name = lock->name; | ||||
| 	class->subclass = subclass; | ||||
| 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry); | ||||
| 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before); | ||||
| 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after); | ||||
| 	class->name_version = count_matching_names(class); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user