leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

dlm: replace sanity checks with WARN_ON

Browse Source 
There are several sanity checks and recover handling if they occur in
the dlm plock handling. From my understanding those operation can't run
in parallel with any list manipulation which involved setting the list
holder of plock_op, if so we have a bug which this sanity check will
warn about. Previously if such sanity check occurred the dlm plock
handling was trying to recover from it by deleting the plock_op from a
list which the holder was set to. However there is a bug in the dlm
plock handling if this case ever happens. To make such bugs are more
visible for further investigations we add a WARN_ON() on those sanity
checks and remove the recovering handling because other possible side
effects.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Aring 2022-04-04 16:06:31 -04:00 committed by David Teigland
parent 42252d0d2a
commit a559790caa
1 changed files with 4 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
fs/dlm/plock.c
View File

@ -157,13 +157,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
goto out;
}
spin_lock(&ops_lock);
if (!list_empty(&op->list)) {
log_error(ls, "dlm_posix_lock: op on list %llx",
(unsigned long long)number);
list_del(&op->list);
}
spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&op->list));
rv = op->info.rv;
@ -190,13 +184,7 @@ static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
struct plock_xop *xop = (struct plock_xop *)op;
int rv = 0;
spin_lock(&ops_lock);
if (!list_empty(&op->list)) {
log_print("dlm_plock_callback: op on list %llx",
(unsigned long long)op->info.number);
list_del(&op->list);
}
spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&op->list));
/* check if the following 2 are still valid or make a copy */
file = xop->file;
@ -289,13 +277,7 @@ int dlm_posix_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
send_op(op);
wait_event(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
spin_lock(&ops_lock);
if (!list_empty(&op->list)) {
log_error(ls, "dlm_posix_unlock: op on list %llx",
(unsigned long long)number);
list_del(&op->list);
}
spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&op->list));
rv = op->info.rv;
@ -343,13 +325,7 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
send_op(op);
wait_event(recv_wq, (op->done != 0));
spin_lock(&ops_lock);
if (!list_empty(&op->list)) {
log_error(ls, "dlm_posix_get: op on list %llx",
(unsigned long long)number);
list_del(&op->list);
}
spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&op->list));
/* info.rv from userspace is 1 for conflict, 0 for no-conflict,
-ENOENT if there are no locks on the file */