forked from Minki/linux
softlockup: use cpu_clock() instead of sched_clock()
sched_clock() is not a reliable time-source, use cpu_clock() instead. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3806204ca9
commit
a3b13c23f1
@ -40,14 +40,16 @@ static struct notifier_block panic_block = {
|
||||
* resolution, and we don't need to waste time with a big divide when
|
||||
* 2^30ns == 1.074s.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static unsigned long get_timestamp(void)
|
||||
static unsigned long get_timestamp(int this_cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return sched_clock() >> 30; /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
|
||||
return cpu_clock(this_cpu) >> 30; /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp();
|
||||
int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
|
||||
|
||||
__raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -91,7 +93,7 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
now = get_timestamp();
|
||||
now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task every second: */
|
||||
if (now > (touch_timestamp + 1))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user