From a390a2f18147533359d4e45cb13438d42580da84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Gortmaker Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 20:05:49 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: don't use module_init in non-modular 83xx suspend code The suspend.o is built for SUSPEND -- which is bool, and hence this code is either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat misleading. Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing. Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall directly in this change means that the runtime impact is zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering. Cc: Scott Wood Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker --- arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c index c9adbfb65006..fcbea4b51a78 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c @@ -445,5 +445,4 @@ static int pmc_init(void) { return platform_driver_register(&pmc_driver); } - -module_init(pmc_init); +device_initcall(pmc_init);