[PATCH] simply fix first_tgid

Like the bug Oleg spotted in first_tid there was also a small off by one
error in first_tgid, when a seek was done on the /proc directory.  This
fixes that and changes the code structure to make it a little more obvious
what is going on.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Eric W. Biederman 2006-06-26 00:25:52 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent de7587343b
commit 9cc8cbc7f8

View File

@ -2040,34 +2040,32 @@ out:
* In the case of a seek we start with &init_task and walk nr
* threads past it.
*/
static struct task_struct *first_tgid(int tgid, int nr)
static struct task_struct *first_tgid(int tgid, unsigned int nr)
{
struct task_struct *pos = NULL;
struct task_struct *pos;
rcu_read_lock();
if (tgid && nr) {
pos = find_task_by_pid(tgid);
if (pos && !thread_group_leader(pos))
pos = NULL;
if (pos)
nr = 0;
if (pos && thread_group_leader(pos))
goto found;
}
/* If nr exceeds the number of processes get out quickly */
pos = NULL;
if (nr && nr >= nr_processes())
goto done;
/* If we haven't found our starting place yet start with
* the init_task and walk nr tasks forward.
*/
if (!pos && (nr >= 0))
pos = next_task(&init_task);
for (; pos && pid_alive(pos); pos = next_task(pos)) {
if (--nr > 0)
continue;
get_task_struct(pos);
for (pos = next_task(&init_task); nr > 0; --nr) {
pos = next_task(pos);
if (pos == &init_task) {
pos = NULL;
goto done;
}
pos = NULL;
}
found:
get_task_struct(pos);
done:
rcu_read_unlock();
return pos;