perf tools: Create function to perform multiple time range checking
Previous patch supports the multiple time range.
For example, select the first and second 10% time slices.
perf report --time 10%/1,10%/2
We need a function to check if a timestamp is in the ranges of
[0, 10%) and [10%, 20%].
Note that it includes the last element in [10%, 20%] but it doesn't
include the last element in [0, 10%). It's to avoid the overlap.
This patch implments a new function perf_time__ranges_skip_sample
for this checking.
Change log:
v4: Let perf_time__ranges_skip_sample be compatible with
perf_time__skip_sample when only one time range.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512738826-2628-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent
13a70f3506
commit
9a9b8b4b22
@@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp)
|
|||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
|
||||||
|
int num, u64 timestamp)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct perf_time_interval *ptime;
|
||||||
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if ((timestamp == 0) || (num == 0))
|
||||||
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (num == 1)
|
||||||
|
return perf_time__skip_sample(&ptime_buf[0], timestamp);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* start/end of multiple time ranges must be valid.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
|
||||||
|
ptime = &ptime_buf[i];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (timestamp >= ptime->start &&
|
||||||
|
((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) ||
|
||||||
|
(timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) {
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return (i == num) ? true : false;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
|
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
|
u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int perf_time__percent_parse_str(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, int num,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp);
|
bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
|
||||||
|
int num, u64 timestamp);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz);
|
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz);
|
int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz);
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user