Merge branch 'btf_dump fixes for s390'

Ilya Leoshkevich says:

====================

This series along with [1] and [2] fixes all the failures in the
btf_dump testsuite currently present on s390, in particular:

* [1] fixes intermittent build bug causing "failed to encode tag ..."
  * error messages.
* [2] fixes missing VAR entries on s390.
* Patch 1 disables Intel-specific code in a testcase.
* Patch 2 fixes an endianness-related bug.
* Patch 3 fixes an alignment-related bug.
* Patch 4 improves overly pessimistic alignment handling.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022521.399302-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022637.399365-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012023218.399568-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2:
- Remove redundant local variables, use t->size directly instead.

Best regards,
Ilya
====================

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andrii Nakryiko 2021-10-20 11:40:02 -07:00
commit 99aaebfc28
2 changed files with 15 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -1562,29 +1562,28 @@ static int btf_dump_get_bitfield_value(struct btf_dump *d,
__u64 *value)
{
__u16 left_shift_bits, right_shift_bits;
__u8 nr_copy_bits, nr_copy_bytes;
const __u8 *bytes = data;
int sz = t->size;
__u8 nr_copy_bits;
__u64 num = 0;
int i;
/* Maximum supported bitfield size is 64 bits */
if (sz > 8) {
pr_warn("unexpected bitfield size %d\n", sz);
if (t->size > 8) {
pr_warn("unexpected bitfield size %d\n", t->size);
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Bitfield value retrieval is done in two steps; first relevant bytes are
* stored in num, then we left/right shift num to eliminate irrelevant bits.
*/
nr_copy_bits = bit_sz + bits_offset;
nr_copy_bytes = t->size;
#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
for (i = nr_copy_bytes - 1; i >= 0; i--)
for (i = t->size - 1; i >= 0; i--)
num = num * 256 + bytes[i];
nr_copy_bits = bit_sz + bits_offset;
#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
for (i = 0; i < nr_copy_bytes; i++)
for (i = 0; i < t->size; i++)
num = num * 256 + bytes[i];
nr_copy_bits = t->size * 8 - bits_offset;
#else
# error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"
#endif
@ -1671,9 +1670,10 @@ static int btf_dump_int_data(struct btf_dump *d,
{
__u8 encoding = btf_int_encoding(t);
bool sign = encoding & BTF_INT_SIGNED;
char buf[16] __aligned(16);
int sz = t->size;
if (sz == 0) {
if (sz == 0 || sz > sizeof(buf)) {
pr_warn("unexpected size %d for id [%u]\n", sz, type_id);
return -EINVAL;
}
@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static int btf_dump_int_data(struct btf_dump *d,
/* handle packed int data - accesses of integers not aligned on
* int boundaries can cause problems on some platforms.
*/
if (!ptr_is_aligned(data, sz))
return btf_dump_bitfield_data(d, t, data, 0, 0);
if (!ptr_is_aligned(data, sz)) {
memcpy(buf, data, sz);
data = buf;
}
switch (sz) {
case 16: {

View File

@ -778,8 +778,10 @@ static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
static void test_btf_dump_var_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
char *str)
{
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
TEST_BTF_DUMP_VAR(btf, d, NULL, str, "cpu_number", int, BTF_F_COMPACT,
"int cpu_number = (int)100", 100);
#endif
TEST_BTF_DUMP_VAR(btf, d, NULL, str, "cpu_profile_flip", int, BTF_F_COMPACT,
"static int cpu_profile_flip = (int)2", 2);
}