s390/als: remove duplicated in-place implementation of stfle
Reuse __stfle call instead of in-place implementation. __stfle is using memcpy and memset functions but they are safe to use, since mem.S is built with -march=z900. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b660c225f
commit
96d3b64b52
@ -105,20 +105,7 @@ void verify_facilities(void)
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list); i++)
|
__stfle(S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list, ARRAY_SIZE(S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list));
|
||||||
S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list[i] = 0;
|
|
||||||
asm volatile(
|
|
||||||
" stfl 0(0)\n"
|
|
||||||
: "=m" (S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list));
|
|
||||||
S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list[0] = (u64)S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list << 32;
|
|
||||||
if (S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list & 0x01000000) {
|
|
||||||
register unsigned long reg0 asm("0") = ARRAY_SIZE(als) - 1;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
asm volatile(".insn s,0xb2b00000,0(%1)" /* stfle */
|
|
||||||
: "+d" (reg0)
|
|
||||||
: "a" (&S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list)
|
|
||||||
: "memory", "cc");
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(als); i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(als); i++) {
|
||||||
if ((S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list[i] & als[i]) != als[i])
|
if ((S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list[i] & als[i]) != als[i])
|
||||||
facility_mismatch();
|
facility_mismatch();
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user