leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'bpf-verifier-disassembly-improvements'

Browse Source 
Edward Cree says:

====================
bpf/verifier: disassembly improvements

Fix the output of print_bpf_insn() for ALU ops that don't look like
 compound assignment (i.e. BPF_END and BPF_NEG).

Sample output for a short test program:
0: (b4) (u32) r0 = (u32) 0
1: (dc) r0 = be32 r0
2: (84) r0 = (u32) -r0
3: (95) exit
processed 4 insns, stack depth 0
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
David S. Miller 2017-09-28 10:23:19 -07:00
commit 93771b0160
1 changed files with 21 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -332,26 +332,45 @@ static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = {
[BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit",
};
static void print_bpf_end_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
verbose("(%02x) r%d = %s%d r%d\n", insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_TO_BE ? "be" : "le",
insn->imm, insn->dst_reg);
}
static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) {
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_END) {
if (class == BPF_ALU64)
verbose("BUG_alu64_%02x\n", insn->code);
else
print_bpf_end_insn(env, insn);
} else if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_NEG) {
verbose("(%02x) r%d = %s-r%d\n",
insn->code, insn->dst_reg,
class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->dst_reg);
} else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n",
insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->dst_reg,
bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->src_reg);
else
} else {
verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n",
insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->dst_reg,
bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4],
class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "",
insn->imm);
}
} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM)
verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n",