forked from Minki/linux
ACPI: scan: Fix up _DEP-related terminology with supplier/consumer
The ACPI namespace scanning code uses the terms master/slave when populating the list of _DEP dependencies, but that use has no external exposures and is not mandated by nor associated with any external specifications. Change the language used through-out to supplier/consumer. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b36b1e9db4
commit
91438aebcd
@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
|
||||
|
||||
struct acpi_dep_data {
|
||||
struct list_head node;
|
||||
acpi_handle master;
|
||||
acpi_handle slave;
|
||||
acpi_handle supplier;
|
||||
acpi_handle consumer;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void acpi_scan_lock_acquire(void)
|
||||
@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(struct acpi_device *adev)
|
||||
if (!dep)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i];
|
||||
dep->slave = adev->handle;
|
||||
dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i];
|
||||
dep->consumer = adev->handle;
|
||||
adev->dep_unmet++;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
|
||||
@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle)
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) {
|
||||
if (dep->master == handle) {
|
||||
acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev);
|
||||
if (dep->supplier == handle) {
|
||||
acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
|
||||
if (!adev)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user