rtlwifi: btcoex: remove identical statements within if-else branches
Since the statements are identical, we can safely remove the statements. The commit42e74946f0
("rtlwifi: btcoexist: Fix if == else warnings in halbtc8821a1ant.c") had fixed the statements, but the commitc6821613e6
("rtlwifi: btcoex: follow linux coding style") that converted coding style and upgraded btcoex didn't include the fix. Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
78e450719c
commit
8cf304a853
@ -1584,11 +1584,7 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_act_bt_sco_hid_only_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
|
||||
/* tdma and coex table */
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_ps_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, true, 5);
|
||||
|
||||
if (BT_8821A_1ANT_WIFI_STATUS_NON_CONNECTED_ASSO_AUTH_SCAN ==
|
||||
wifi_status)
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void btc8821a1ant_act_wifi_con_bt_acl_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
|
||||
@ -1991,16 +1987,9 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_run_coexist_mechanism(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist)
|
||||
wifi_rssi_state =
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_wifi_rssi_state(btcoexist, 1, 2,
|
||||
30, 0);
|
||||
if ((wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
|
||||
(wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH)) {
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
|
||||
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
|
||||
0, 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
|
||||
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
|
||||
0, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
|
||||
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
|
||||
0, 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC,
|
||||
0, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user