rtlwifi: btcoex: remove identical statements within if-else branches

Since the statements are identical, we can safely remove the statements.
The commit 42e74946f0 ("rtlwifi: btcoexist: Fix if == else warnings in
halbtc8821a1ant.c") had fixed the statements, but the commit c6821613e6
("rtlwifi: btcoex: follow linux coding style") that converted coding style
and upgraded btcoex didn't include the fix.

Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This commit is contained in:
Ping-Ke Shih 2018-04-09 15:51:31 +08:00 committed by Kalle Valo
parent 78e450719c
commit 8cf304a853

View File

@ -1584,11 +1584,7 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_act_bt_sco_hid_only_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
/* tdma and coex table */
btc8821a1ant_ps_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, true, 5);
if (BT_8821A_1ANT_WIFI_STATUS_NON_CONNECTED_ASSO_AUTH_SCAN ==
wifi_status)
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
else
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
}
static void btc8821a1ant_act_wifi_con_bt_acl_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
@ -1991,16 +1987,9 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_run_coexist_mechanism(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist)
wifi_rssi_state =
btc8821a1ant_wifi_rssi_state(btcoexist, 1, 2,
30, 0);
if ((wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
(wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH)) {
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
0, 1);
} else {
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
0, 1);
}
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
0, 1);
} else {
btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC,
0, 0, 0, 0);