forked from Minki/linux
[CPUFREQ] speedstep-centrino should ignore upper performance control bits
On some systems there could be bits set in the upper half of the control value provided by the _PSS object. These bits are only relevant for cpufreq drivers that use IO ports which are not currently supported by the speedstep-centrino driver. The current MSR oriented code assumes that upper bits are not set and thus fails to work correctly when they are. e.g. the control and status value equality check failed on the IBM x3650 even though the ACPI spec allows inequality. Signed-off-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
55e337345d
commit
8b9c6671f8
@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#define dprintk(msg...) cpufreq_debug_printk(CPUFREQ_DEBUG_DRIVER, "speedstep-centrino", msg)
|
||||
|
||||
#define INTEL_MSR_RANGE (0xffff)
|
||||
|
||||
struct cpu_id
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -463,8 +464,9 @@ static int centrino_cpu_init_acpi(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i=0; i<p->state_count; i++) {
|
||||
if (p->states[i].control != p->states[i].status) {
|
||||
dprintk("Different control (%llu) and status values (%llu)\n",
|
||||
if ((p->states[i].control & INTEL_MSR_RANGE) !=
|
||||
(p->states[i].status & INTEL_MSR_RANGE)) {
|
||||
dprintk("Different MSR bits in control (%llu) and status (%llu)\n",
|
||||
p->states[i].control, p->states[i].status);
|
||||
result = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto err_unreg;
|
||||
@ -500,7 +502,7 @@ static int centrino_cpu_init_acpi(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i=0; i<p->state_count; i++) {
|
||||
centrino_model[cpu]->op_points[i].index = p->states[i].control;
|
||||
centrino_model[cpu]->op_points[i].index = p->states[i].control & INTEL_MSR_RANGE;
|
||||
centrino_model[cpu]->op_points[i].frequency = p->states[i].core_frequency * 1000;
|
||||
dprintk("adding state %i with frequency %u and control value %04x\n",
|
||||
i, centrino_model[cpu]->op_points[i].frequency, centrino_model[cpu]->op_points[i].index);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user