net/mlx5: Add send to vport rules on paired device
When two mlx5 devices are paired in switchdev mode, always offload the send-to-vport rule to the peer E-Switch. This allows to abstract the logic when this is really necessary (single FDB) and combine the logic of both cases into one. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8e6a9e6d6
commit
898b078615
@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
|
||||
#include "en/devlink.h"
|
||||
#include "fs_core.h"
|
||||
#include "lib/mlx5.h"
|
||||
#include "lib/devcom.h"
|
||||
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
|
||||
#include "diag/en_rep_tracepoint.h"
|
||||
#include "en_accel/ipsec.h"
|
||||
@ -310,6 +311,8 @@ static void mlx5e_sqs2vport_stop(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(rep_sq, tmp, &rpriv->vport_sqs_list, list) {
|
||||
mlx5_eswitch_del_send_to_vport_rule(rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule);
|
||||
if (rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer)
|
||||
mlx5_eswitch_del_send_to_vport_rule(rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer);
|
||||
list_del(&rep_sq->list);
|
||||
kfree(rep_sq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -319,6 +322,7 @@ static int mlx5e_sqs2vport_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep,
|
||||
u32 *sqns_array, int sqns_num)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *peer_esw = NULL;
|
||||
struct mlx5_flow_handle *flow_rule;
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv;
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_sq *rep_sq;
|
||||
@ -329,6 +333,10 @@ static int mlx5e_sqs2vport_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep);
|
||||
if (mlx5_devcom_is_paired(esw->dev->priv.devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS))
|
||||
peer_esw = mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data(esw->dev->priv.devcom,
|
||||
MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < sqns_num; i++) {
|
||||
rep_sq = kzalloc(sizeof(*rep_sq), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!rep_sq) {
|
||||
@ -345,12 +353,34 @@ static int mlx5e_sqs2vport_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
goto out_err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule = flow_rule;
|
||||
rep_sq->sqn = sqns_array[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (peer_esw) {
|
||||
flow_rule = mlx5_eswitch_add_send_to_vport_rule(peer_esw, esw,
|
||||
rep, sqns_array[i]);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(flow_rule)) {
|
||||
err = PTR_ERR(flow_rule);
|
||||
mlx5_eswitch_del_send_to_vport_rule(rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule);
|
||||
kfree(rep_sq);
|
||||
goto out_err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer = flow_rule;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_add(&rep_sq->list, &rpriv->vport_sqs_list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (peer_esw)
|
||||
mlx5_devcom_release_peer_data(esw->dev->priv.devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
out_err:
|
||||
mlx5e_sqs2vport_stop(esw, rep);
|
||||
|
||||
if (peer_esw)
|
||||
mlx5_devcom_release_peer_data(esw->dev->priv.devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS);
|
||||
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1264,10 +1294,64 @@ static void *mlx5e_vport_rep_get_proto_dev(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
|
||||
return rpriv->netdev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void mlx5e_vport_rep_event_unpair(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv;
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_sq *rep_sq;
|
||||
|
||||
rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(rep_sq, &rpriv->vport_sqs_list, list) {
|
||||
if (!rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
mlx5_eswitch_del_send_to_vport_rule(rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer);
|
||||
rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int mlx5e_vport_rep_event_pair(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep,
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *peer_esw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mlx5_flow_handle *flow_rule;
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv;
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_sq *rep_sq;
|
||||
|
||||
rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(rep_sq, &rpriv->vport_sqs_list, list) {
|
||||
if (rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
flow_rule = mlx5_eswitch_add_send_to_vport_rule(peer_esw, esw, rep, rep_sq->sqn);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(flow_rule))
|
||||
goto err_out;
|
||||
rep_sq->send_to_vport_rule_peer = flow_rule;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
err_out:
|
||||
mlx5e_vport_rep_event_unpair(rep);
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(flow_rule);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int mlx5e_vport_rep_event(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep,
|
||||
enum mlx5_switchdev_event event,
|
||||
void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (event == MLX5_SWITCHDEV_EVENT_PAIR)
|
||||
err = mlx5e_vport_rep_event_pair(esw, rep, data);
|
||||
else if (event == MLX5_SWITCHDEV_EVENT_UNPAIR)
|
||||
mlx5e_vport_rep_event_unpair(rep);
|
||||
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct mlx5_eswitch_rep_ops rep_ops = {
|
||||
.load = mlx5e_vport_rep_load,
|
||||
.unload = mlx5e_vport_rep_unload,
|
||||
.get_proto_dev = mlx5e_vport_rep_get_proto_dev
|
||||
.get_proto_dev = mlx5e_vport_rep_get_proto_dev,
|
||||
.event = mlx5e_vport_rep_event,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int mlx5e_rep_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
|
||||
|
@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ struct mlx5e_encap_entry {
|
||||
|
||||
struct mlx5e_rep_sq {
|
||||
struct mlx5_flow_handle *send_to_vport_rule;
|
||||
struct mlx5_flow_handle *send_to_vport_rule_peer;
|
||||
u32 sqn;
|
||||
struct list_head list;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1616,7 +1616,18 @@ static int esw_create_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
|
||||
goto ns_err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
table_size = esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ +
|
||||
/* To be strictly correct:
|
||||
* MLX5_MAX_PORTS * (esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ)
|
||||
* should be:
|
||||
* esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ +
|
||||
* peer_esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ
|
||||
* but as the peer device might not be in switchdev mode it's not
|
||||
* possible. We use the fact that by default FW sets max vfs and max sfs
|
||||
* to the same value on both devices. If it needs to be changed in the future note
|
||||
* the peer miss group should also be created based on the number of
|
||||
* total vports of the peer (currently is also uses esw->total_vports).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
table_size = MLX5_MAX_PORTS * (esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ) +
|
||||
MLX5_ESW_MISS_FLOWS + esw->total_vports + esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs;
|
||||
|
||||
/* create the slow path fdb with encap set, so further table instances
|
||||
@ -1673,7 +1684,8 @@ static int esw_create_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
|
||||
source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id_valid, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ix = esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ;
|
||||
/* See comment above table_size calculation */
|
||||
ix = MLX5_MAX_PORTS * (esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ);
|
||||
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, start_flow_index, 0);
|
||||
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, end_flow_index, ix - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user