forked from Minki/linux
locking/selftests: Add a selftest for check_irq_usage()
Johannes Berg reported a lockdep problem which could be reproduced by the special test case introduced in this patch, so add it. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b1f8c6179
commit
8946ccc25e
@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ __setup("debug_locks_verbose=", setup_debug_locks_verbose);
|
||||
#define LOCKTYPE_WW 0x10
|
||||
#define LOCKTYPE_RTMUTEX 0x20
|
||||
#define LOCKTYPE_LL 0x40
|
||||
#define LOCKTYPE_SPECIAL 0x80
|
||||
|
||||
static struct ww_acquire_ctx t, t2;
|
||||
static struct ww_mutex o, o2, o3;
|
||||
@ -2744,6 +2745,66 @@ static void local_lock_tests(void)
|
||||
pr_cont("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void hardirq_deadlock_softirq_not_deadlock(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* mutex_A is hardirq-unsafe and softirq-unsafe */
|
||||
/* mutex_A -> lock_C */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&mutex_A);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_DISABLE();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_C);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_C);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_ENABLE();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&mutex_A);
|
||||
|
||||
/* lock_A is hardirq-safe */
|
||||
HARDIRQ_ENTER();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_A);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_A);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_EXIT();
|
||||
|
||||
/* lock_A -> lock_B */
|
||||
HARDIRQ_DISABLE();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_A);
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_B);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_B);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_A);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_ENABLE();
|
||||
|
||||
/* lock_B -> lock_C */
|
||||
HARDIRQ_DISABLE();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_B);
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_C);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_C);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_B);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_ENABLE();
|
||||
|
||||
/* lock_D is softirq-safe */
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_ENTER();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_D);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_D);
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_EXIT();
|
||||
|
||||
/* And lock_D is hardirq-unsafe */
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_DISABLE();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_D);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_D);
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_ENABLE();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* mutex_A -> lock_C -> lock_D is softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, not
|
||||
* deadlock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* lock_A -> lock_B -> lock_C -> lock_D is hardirq-safe ->
|
||||
* hardirq-unsafe, deadlock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
HARDIRQ_DISABLE();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_C);
|
||||
spin_lock(&lock_D);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_D);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lock_C);
|
||||
HARDIRQ_ENABLE();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void locking_selftest(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2872,6 +2933,10 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
|
||||
|
||||
local_lock_tests();
|
||||
|
||||
print_testname("hardirq_unsafe_softirq_safe");
|
||||
dotest(hardirq_deadlock_softirq_not_deadlock, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_SPECIAL);
|
||||
pr_cont("\n");
|
||||
|
||||
if (unexpected_testcase_failures) {
|
||||
printk("-----------------------------------------------------------------\n");
|
||||
debug_locks = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user