locking/mutex: Add comment to __mutex_owner() to deter usage
Attempt to deter usage, this is not a public interface. It is entirely possible to implement a conformant mutex without having this owner field (in fact, we used to have that). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
91ab883eb2
commit
88e77dc6a3
@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ struct mutex {
|
|||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Internal helper function; C doesn't allow us to hide it :/
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* DO NOT USE (outside of mutex code).
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
static inline struct task_struct *__mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
|
static inline struct task_struct *__mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~0x07);
|
return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~0x07);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user