platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Only implement irq_set_wake on Bay Trail

Commit c3b8e884de ("platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Implement irq_set_wake"),
was written to fix some wakeup issues on Bay Trail (BYT) devices.

We've received a bug report that this causes a suspend regression on some
Cherry Trail (CHT) based devices.

To fix the issues this causes on CHT devices, this commit modifies the
irq_set_wake support so that we only implement irq_set_wake on BYT devices,

Fixes: c3b8e884de ("platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: ... irq_set_wake")
Reported-and-tested-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Hans de Goede 2019-02-03 10:42:33 +01:00 committed by Andy Shevchenko
parent 0bbbe97f2f
commit 871f1f2bcb

View File

@ -51,11 +51,14 @@
#define GPE0A_STS_PORT 0x420
#define GPE0A_EN_PORT 0x428
#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
#define BAYTRAIL 0x01
#define CHERRYTRAIL 0x02
#define ICPU(model, data) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, data }
static const struct x86_cpu_id int0002_cpu_ids[] = {
ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT), /* Valleyview, Bay Trail */
ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT), /* Braswell, Cherry Trail */
ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT, BAYTRAIL), /* Valleyview, Bay Trail */
ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT, CHERRYTRAIL), /* Braswell, Cherry Trail */
{}
};
@ -135,7 +138,7 @@ static irqreturn_t int0002_irq(int irq, void *data)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static struct irq_chip int0002_irqchip = {
static struct irq_chip int0002_byt_irqchip = {
.name = DRV_NAME,
.irq_ack = int0002_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = int0002_irq_mask,
@ -143,10 +146,22 @@ static struct irq_chip int0002_irqchip = {
.irq_set_wake = int0002_irq_set_wake,
};
static struct irq_chip int0002_cht_irqchip = {
.name = DRV_NAME,
.irq_ack = int0002_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = int0002_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = int0002_irq_unmask,
/*
* No set_wake, on CHT the IRQ is typically shared with the ACPI SCI
* and we don't want to mess with the ACPI SCI irq settings.
*/
};
static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
const struct x86_cpu_id *cpu_id;
struct irq_chip *irq_chip;
struct gpio_chip *chip;
int irq, ret;
@ -195,14 +210,19 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(chip, &int0002_irqchip, 0, handle_edge_irq,
if (cpu_id->driver_data == BAYTRAIL)
irq_chip = &int0002_byt_irqchip;
else
irq_chip = &int0002_cht_irqchip;
ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(chip, irq_chip, 0, handle_edge_irq,
IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Error adding irqchip: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(chip, &int0002_irqchip, irq, NULL);
gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(chip, irq_chip, irq, NULL);
return 0;
}