ipv6: fix a potential deadlock in do_ipv6_setsockopt()
Baozeng reported this deadlock case:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock([ 165.136033] sk_lock-AF_INET6);
lock([ 165.136033] rtnl_mutex);
lock([ 165.136033] sk_lock-AF_INET6);
lock([ 165.136033] rtnl_mutex);
Similar to commit 87e9f03159
("ipv4: fix a potential deadlock in mcast getsockopt() path")
this is due to we still have a case, ipv6_sock_mc_close(),
where we acquire sk_lock before rtnl_lock. Close this deadlock
with the similar solution, that is always acquire rtnl lock first.
Fixes: baf606d9c9 ("ipv4,ipv6: grab rtnl before locking the socket")
Reported-by: Baozeng Ding <sploving1@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Baozeng Ding <sploving1@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
8dbad1a811
commit
8651be8f14
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
|
|||||||
const struct in6_addr *addr);
|
const struct in6_addr *addr);
|
||||||
int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
|
int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
|
||||||
const struct in6_addr *addr);
|
const struct in6_addr *addr);
|
||||||
|
void __ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk);
|
||||||
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk);
|
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk);
|
||||||
bool inet6_mc_check(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *mc_addr,
|
bool inet6_mc_check(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *mc_addr,
|
||||||
const struct in6_addr *src_addr);
|
const struct in6_addr *src_addr);
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct ipv6_txoptions *ipv6_update_options(struct sock *sk,
|
|||||||
static bool setsockopt_needs_rtnl(int optname)
|
static bool setsockopt_needs_rtnl(int optname)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
switch (optname) {
|
switch (optname) {
|
||||||
|
case IPV6_ADDRFORM:
|
||||||
case IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP:
|
case IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP:
|
||||||
case IPV6_DROP_MEMBERSHIP:
|
case IPV6_DROP_MEMBERSHIP:
|
||||||
case IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST:
|
case IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST:
|
||||||
@@ -198,7 +199,7 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fl6_free_socklist(sk);
|
fl6_free_socklist(sk);
|
||||||
ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
|
__ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Sock is moving from IPv6 to IPv4 (sk_prot), so
|
* Sock is moving from IPv6 to IPv4 (sk_prot), so
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -276,16 +276,14 @@ static struct inet6_dev *ip6_mc_find_dev_rcu(struct net *net,
|
|||||||
return idev;
|
return idev;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
|
void __ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
|
struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
|
||||||
struct ipv6_mc_socklist *mc_lst;
|
struct ipv6_mc_socklist *mc_lst;
|
||||||
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
|
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!rcu_access_pointer(np->ipv6_mc_list))
|
ASSERT_RTNL();
|
||||||
return;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rtnl_lock();
|
|
||||||
while ((mc_lst = rtnl_dereference(np->ipv6_mc_list)) != NULL) {
|
while ((mc_lst = rtnl_dereference(np->ipv6_mc_list)) != NULL) {
|
||||||
struct net_device *dev;
|
struct net_device *dev;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -303,8 +301,17 @@ void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
atomic_sub(sizeof(*mc_lst), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
|
atomic_sub(sizeof(*mc_lst), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
|
||||||
kfree_rcu(mc_lst, rcu);
|
kfree_rcu(mc_lst, rcu);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
void ipv6_sock_mc_close(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (!rcu_access_pointer(np->ipv6_mc_list))
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
rtnl_lock();
|
||||||
|
__ipv6_sock_mc_close(sk);
|
||||||
rtnl_unlock();
|
rtnl_unlock();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user