bpf: sock_ops sk access may stomp registers when dst_reg = src_reg
Similar to patch ("bpf: sock_ops ctx access may stomp registers") if the
src_reg = dst_reg when reading the sk field of a sock_ops struct we
generate xlated code,
53: (61) r9 = *(u32 *)(r9 +28)
54: (15) if r9 == 0x0 goto pc+3
56: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 +0)
This stomps on the r9 reg to do the sk_fullsock check and then when
reading the skops->sk field instead of the sk pointer we get the
sk_fullsock. To fix use similar pattern noted in the previous fix
and use the temp field to save/restore a register used to do
sk_fullsock check.
After the fix the generated xlated code reads,
52: (7b) *(u64 *)(r9 +32) = r8
53: (61) r8 = *(u32 *)(r9 +28)
54: (15) if r9 == 0x0 goto pc+3
55: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 +32)
56: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 +0)
57: (05) goto pc+1
58: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 +32)
Here r9 register was in-use so r8 is chosen as the temporary register.
In line 52 r8 is saved in temp variable and at line 54 restored in case
fullsock != 0. Finally we handle fullsock == 0 case by restoring at
line 58.
This adds a new macro SOCK_OPS_GET_SK it is almost possible to merge
this with SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD, but I found the extra branch logic a
bit more confusing than just adding a new macro despite a bit of
duplicating code.
Fixes: 1314ef5611
("bpf: export bpf_sock for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS prog type")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159718349653.4728.6559437186853473612.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd09af0107
commit
84f44df664
@ -8358,6 +8358,43 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
|
||||
} \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
int fullsock_reg = si->dst_reg, reg = BPF_REG_9, jmp = 1; \
|
||||
if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg) \
|
||||
reg--; \
|
||||
if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg) \
|
||||
reg--; \
|
||||
if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) { \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, si->src_reg, reg, \
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \
|
||||
temp)); \
|
||||
fullsock_reg = reg; \
|
||||
jmp += 2; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( \
|
||||
struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \
|
||||
is_fullsock), \
|
||||
fullsock_reg, si->src_reg, \
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \
|
||||
is_fullsock)); \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, fullsock_reg, 0, jmp); \
|
||||
if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, si->src_reg, \
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \
|
||||
temp)); \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF( \
|
||||
struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk),\
|
||||
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg, \
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk));\
|
||||
if (si->dst_reg == si->src_reg) { \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_JMP_A(1); \
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, si->src_reg, \
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, \
|
||||
temp)); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP_SOCK_FIELD(FIELD) \
|
||||
SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD(FIELD, FIELD, struct tcp_sock)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8642,17 +8679,7 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
|
||||
SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP_SOCK_FIELD(bytes_acked);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk):
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(
|
||||
struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,
|
||||
is_fullsock),
|
||||
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,
|
||||
is_fullsock));
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, si->dst_reg, 0, 1);
|
||||
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(
|
||||
struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk),
|
||||
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk));
|
||||
SOCK_OPS_GET_SK();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return insn - insn_buf;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user