net: Add part of TCP counts explanations in snmp_counters.rst
Add explanations of some generic TCP counters, fast open related counters and TCP abort related counters and several examples. Signed-off-by: yupeng <yupeng0921@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17bf1693a6
commit
80cc49507b
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ multicast packets, and would always be updated together with
|
|||||||
IpExtOutOctets.
|
IpExtOutOctets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets
|
* IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets
|
||||||
They are linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note,
|
They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note,
|
||||||
RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they
|
RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they
|
||||||
are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC
|
are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC
|
||||||
layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they
|
layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they
|
||||||
@ -174,6 +174,163 @@ IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4),
|
|||||||
IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus
|
IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus
|
||||||
IcmpInErrors.
|
IcmpInErrors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
General TCP counters
|
||||||
|
==================
|
||||||
|
* TcpInSegs
|
||||||
|
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in
|
||||||
|
RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum
|
||||||
|
error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included:
|
||||||
|
if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2
|
||||||
|
address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast
|
||||||
|
packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the
|
||||||
|
packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard
|
||||||
|
these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter
|
||||||
|
isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs
|
||||||
|
counter would only increase 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpOutSegs
|
||||||
|
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213,
|
||||||
|
it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK
|
||||||
|
and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of
|
||||||
|
GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will
|
||||||
|
increase 2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpActiveOpens
|
||||||
|
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT
|
||||||
|
state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always
|
||||||
|
increase 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpPassiveOpens
|
||||||
|
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into
|
||||||
|
the SYN-RCVD state.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TCP Fast Open
|
||||||
|
============
|
||||||
|
When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the
|
||||||
|
packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel
|
||||||
|
code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is
|
||||||
|
disabled when:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- A zero window was announced from us
|
||||||
|
- zero window probing
|
||||||
|
is only handled properly on the slow path.
|
||||||
|
- Out of order segments arrived.
|
||||||
|
- Urgent data is expected.
|
||||||
|
- There is no buffer space left
|
||||||
|
- Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received
|
||||||
|
(detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags)
|
||||||
|
- Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders
|
||||||
|
or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack
|
||||||
|
value must stay constant)
|
||||||
|
- Unexpected TCP option.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions
|
||||||
|
are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle
|
||||||
|
them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very
|
||||||
|
good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is
|
||||||
|
used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both
|
||||||
|
directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will
|
||||||
|
try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the
|
||||||
|
established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel
|
||||||
|
will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel
|
||||||
|
receives packets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks
|
||||||
|
If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if
|
||||||
|
kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1,
|
||||||
|
if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will
|
||||||
|
increase 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPHPHits
|
||||||
|
If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet),
|
||||||
|
and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will
|
||||||
|
increase 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TCP abort
|
||||||
|
========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnData
|
||||||
|
It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the
|
||||||
|
connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the
|
||||||
|
connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this
|
||||||
|
counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER
|
||||||
|
section of the `socket man page`_:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function
|
||||||
|
will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data
|
||||||
|
async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger
|
||||||
|
to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but
|
||||||
|
wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait
|
||||||
|
time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0,
|
||||||
|
when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST
|
||||||
|
immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose
|
||||||
|
This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when
|
||||||
|
the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation,
|
||||||
|
kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory
|
||||||
|
When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track
|
||||||
|
the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an
|
||||||
|
app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other
|
||||||
|
side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the
|
||||||
|
socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket
|
||||||
|
becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side,
|
||||||
|
and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no
|
||||||
|
enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to
|
||||||
|
the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will
|
||||||
|
increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of
|
||||||
|
the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout
|
||||||
|
This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such
|
||||||
|
situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger
|
||||||
|
When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting
|
||||||
|
for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and
|
||||||
|
delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of
|
||||||
|
Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option,
|
||||||
|
you could let kernel follow this behavior.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TcpExtTCPAbortFailed
|
||||||
|
The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is
|
||||||
|
satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process,
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
examples
|
examples
|
||||||
=======
|
=======
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -220,3 +377,369 @@ and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by:
|
|||||||
* 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command)
|
* 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84.
|
So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
tcp 3-way handshake
|
||||||
|
------------------
|
||||||
|
On server side, we run::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000
|
||||||
|
Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On client side, we run::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000
|
||||||
|
Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they
|
||||||
|
completed the 3-way handshake.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On server side, we can find below nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp
|
||||||
|
TcpPassiveOpens 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 2 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On client side, we can find below nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp
|
||||||
|
TcpActiveOpens 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 2 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into
|
||||||
|
SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received
|
||||||
|
SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2
|
||||||
|
packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK
|
||||||
|
of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so
|
||||||
|
TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent
|
||||||
|
ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased
|
||||||
|
1, TcpOutSegs increased 2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TCP normal traffic
|
||||||
|
-----------------
|
||||||
|
Run nc on server::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000
|
||||||
|
Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Run nc on client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||||
|
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example)::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||||
|
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||||
|
hello
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The client side nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat
|
||||||
|
#kernel
|
||||||
|
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInOctets 52 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The server side nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat
|
||||||
|
#kernel
|
||||||
|
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInOctets 58 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple)::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||||
|
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||||
|
hello
|
||||||
|
world
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Client side nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat
|
||||||
|
#kernel
|
||||||
|
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPHPAcks 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInOctets 52 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Server side nstat output::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat
|
||||||
|
#kernel
|
||||||
|
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPHPHits 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInOctets 58 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0
|
||||||
|
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat,
|
||||||
|
we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks',
|
||||||
|
but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side
|
||||||
|
nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the
|
||||||
|
second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first
|
||||||
|
server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were
|
||||||
|
exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server
|
||||||
|
replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the
|
||||||
|
TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast
|
||||||
|
path immediately when the connection comes into the established state,
|
||||||
|
but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the
|
||||||
|
fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives
|
||||||
|
packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window
|
||||||
|
scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or
|
||||||
|
client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 )
|
||||||
|
Netid Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
|
||||||
|
tcp 0 0 192.168.122.250:40654 192.168.122.251:9000
|
||||||
|
ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale
|
||||||
|
option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server
|
||||||
|
reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not
|
||||||
|
enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again,
|
||||||
|
and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is
|
||||||
|
enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by
|
||||||
|
the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled,
|
||||||
|
so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled,
|
||||||
|
and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it
|
||||||
|
was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose
|
||||||
|
--------------------
|
||||||
|
On the server side, we run below python script::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import socket
|
||||||
|
import time
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
port = 9000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||||
|
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||||
|
s.listen(1)
|
||||||
|
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||||
|
while True:
|
||||||
|
time.sleep(9999999)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from
|
||||||
|
the connection.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello"
|
||||||
|
packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't
|
||||||
|
read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we
|
||||||
|
could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a
|
||||||
|
RST after we type Ctrl-C.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout
|
||||||
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than
|
||||||
|
net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans.
|
||||||
|
Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Client code (create 64 connection to server)::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py
|
||||||
|
import socket
|
||||||
|
import time
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
server = 'nstat-b' # server address
|
||||||
|
port = 9000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
count = 64
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
connection_list = []
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for i in range(64):
|
||||||
|
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||||
|
s.connect((server, port))
|
||||||
|
connection_list.append(s)
|
||||||
|
print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
while True:
|
||||||
|
time.sleep(99999)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Server code (accept 64 connection from client)::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py
|
||||||
|
import socket
|
||||||
|
import time
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
port = 9000
|
||||||
|
count = 64
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||||
|
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||||
|
s.listen(count)
|
||||||
|
connection_list = []
|
||||||
|
while True:
|
||||||
|
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||||
|
connection_list.append((sock, addr))
|
||||||
|
print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Run the python scripts on server and client.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On server::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
python3 server_orphan.py
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
python3 client_orphan.py
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Run iptables on server::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory 54 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Check orphane socket count on client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s
|
||||||
|
Total: 131 (kernel 0)
|
||||||
|
TCP: 14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Transport Total IP IPv6
|
||||||
|
* 0 - -
|
||||||
|
RAW 1 0 1
|
||||||
|
UDP 1 1 0
|
||||||
|
TCP 14 13 1
|
||||||
|
INET 16 14 2
|
||||||
|
FRAG 0 0 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and
|
||||||
|
client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and
|
||||||
|
client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from
|
||||||
|
the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client
|
||||||
|
would try to close these connections, and before they are closed
|
||||||
|
gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables
|
||||||
|
of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin
|
||||||
|
from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1
|
||||||
|
stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo
|
||||||
|
10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would
|
||||||
|
only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client
|
||||||
|
system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so
|
||||||
|
the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the
|
||||||
|
value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the
|
||||||
|
exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel
|
||||||
|
decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel
|
||||||
|
doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing
|
||||||
|
performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the
|
||||||
|
approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the
|
||||||
|
exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than
|
||||||
|
tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you
|
||||||
|
would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If
|
||||||
|
tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease
|
||||||
|
tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this
|
||||||
|
issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the
|
||||||
|
tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we
|
||||||
|
can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the
|
||||||
|
iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive
|
||||||
|
fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the
|
||||||
|
FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find
|
||||||
|
10 timeout on the client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout 10 0.0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger
|
||||||
|
---------------------
|
||||||
|
The server side code::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py
|
||||||
|
import socket
|
||||||
|
import time
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
port = 9000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||||
|
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||||
|
s.listen(1)
|
||||||
|
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||||
|
while True:
|
||||||
|
time.sleep(9999999)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The client side code::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py
|
||||||
|
import socket
|
||||||
|
import struct
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
server = 'nstat-b' # server address
|
||||||
|
port = 9000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||||
|
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10))
|
||||||
|
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1))
|
||||||
|
s.connect((server, port))
|
||||||
|
s.close()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Run server_linger.py on server::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Run client_linger.py on client::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||||
|
TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger 1 0.0
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user